2
4. Address business and technical audiences in separate white papers.
Business and technical audiences struggle with significantly different challenges, and
seek quite different information about solutions. Their perspectives, as well as the
language to which they respond, are often widely divergent. Hence, attempting to address
both of these audiences in a single paper (sometimes called a “hybrid” white paper) is
almost always significantly less effective than developing a separate paper for each type
of audience. Most readers respond more positively when the information the paper
provides is tailored to their particular needs, motivations, background, and objectives.
Trying to develop one paper that addresses both audiences is unwieldy and inefficient,
and often costly to rectify by eventually rewriting the paper in two versions.
5. Stick with the facts; avoid posing strong opinions or specifying required
courses of action in a white paper.
Some writers believe that white paper readers
welcome an opinionated approach. However, most
business and technical decision makers (the primary
audiences of white papers) are independent thinkers.
They usually do not respond well to unsubstantiated
opinions or instructions that they “must” implement
a product or they “must” adopt a strategy. Stating
facts, describing options and alternatives, and factually explaining the likely ramifications
of various actions is likely to resonate better with the information seekers that read white
papers. This latter approach demonstrates thought leadership most effectively. It provides
readers with the information they seek so that they can make their own decisions.
6. Motivate readers by providing useful information, not by instilling fear,
uncertainty, and doubt.
For thousands of years, humans have been highly motivated by fear. However, this does
not mean that instilling fear, uncertainty, and doubt in readers’ minds is the optimal
strategy for white papers. Most business and technical decision makers do not operate
based on these emotions. Instead, they typically evaluate options to implement sound
decisions, especially in situations with significant financial implications. Overly used
predictions of “doom and gloom” may seem trite to sophisticated audiences. White paper
readers usually prefer factual statements of the possible repercussions of various courses
of action to aid them in their evaluations and decisions.
7. Include third-party information.
By synthesizing related information from various
sources on a particular topic, a white paper can be
a powerful resource for readers. Third parties (i.e.,
parties other than the author and reader) are
excellent information sources, especially when
provide readers with the
information they seek so
that they can make their
own decisions.
powerful resource for
readers, especially when
third-party information is
incorporated.