The Praxis
Middle School Mathematics Study Companion
3. Determines the changes that would
improve the validity, generalizability,
coherence, and/or precision of an
explanation or justification
4. Evaluates whether counterarguments
address a critique of a given justification
5. Evaluates definitions or other
mathematical language for validity,
generalizability, precision, usefulness in
a particular context, or support of key
ideas
Mathematical problems, tasks,
examples, and procedures
6. Identifies problems or tasks that fit a
particular structure, address the same
concept, demonstrate desired
characteristics, or elicit particular
student thinking
7. Identifies two or more problems that
systematically vary in difficulty or
complexity
8. Evaluates the usefulness of examples
for introducing a concept, illustrating an
idea, or demonstrating a strategy,
procedure, or practice
9. Identifies examples that support
particular strategies or address
particular student questions,
misconceptions, or challenges with
content
10. Identifies nonexamples or
counterexamples that highlight a
mathematical distinction or
demonstrate why a student conjecture
is incorrect or partially incorrect
11. Evaluates procedures for working with
mathematics content to identify special
cases in which the procedure might be
problematic or for validity,
appropriateness, or robustness
Mathematical representations, models,
manipulatives, and technology
12. Evaluates representations and models
(e.g., concrete, pictorial) in terms of
validity, generalizability, usefulness for
supporting students’ understanding, or
fit to the concept, calculation, etc. to be
represented
13. Evaluates how representations and
models (e.g., concrete, pictorial) have
been used to show particular ideas,
relationships between ideas, processes,
or strategies
14. Evaluates the use of technology
(e.g., graphing tools, software) for its
appropriateness or its support of key
ideas
Students’ mathematical reasoning
15. Identifies likely misconceptions about or
partial understanding of particular
mathematics content and practices
16. Identifies how new mathematics
content and practices can build on or
connect to students’ prior knowledge,
including misconceptions and errors
17. Evaluates or compares student work
(e.g., solutions, explanations,
justifications, representations) in terms
of validity, generalizability, coherence,
and/or precision
18. Evaluates student work to identify the
use of a particular concept, idea, or
strategy
19. Identifies how a student’s reasoning
would replicate across similar problems
20. Identifies different pieces of student
work that demonstrate the same
reasoning
21. Identifies situations in which student
work that seems valid might mask
incorrect thinking