Faculty members may participate in generating, administering, or scoring parts of the written portion of
the candidacy examination. Non-Graduate Faculty members may be appointed to the candidacy
examination committee by approval of the GSC and by petition to the Graduate School. Non-Graduate
Faculty are in addition to the required four, current Ohio State Graduate Faculty members.
Student, advisor, and SAC should together come to a written agreement in the form of a memorandum
of understanding regarding the format and timeline of the candidacy exam. Additionally, the time and
date of the written and oral portions of the exam should be determined jointly. In lieu of standard
questions from each SAC member, students, and in consultation with their Advisor and SAC, can elect to
take the written portion using the “Proposal” option detailed below.
Guidelines for the “Questions” options for Ph.D. Candidacy:
Each portion of the written exam can be either open or closed book, as determined by each SAC
member. After the final written exam is completed, the advisor will collate all of the responses and
distribute them to the SAC. The SAC will then have one week to determine if the exam response is
sufficient to move to the oral exam. It is up to each SAC member whether they would like to make the
determination of adequacy of the written exam before proceeding to the oral exam, based on their
individual exam, or on the exam as a whole. This is equivalent to passing the written part of the general
exam. If a student does not pass the written part of the candidacy exam, the SAC will determine what
additional study or other requirements must be met to reschedule the written portion (See Waiver
information below). The student must file a notice that they will be taking their candidacy exam with
the Graduate School (via GRADFORMS) no later than 14 days before the intended oral exam.
The oral examination must occur within one month of the student distributing the finished written exam
to the SAC. The oral exam consists of a two-hour oral examination on topics from the written
examination as well as any general knowledge pertaining to the student’s program. Upon a unanimous
decision that the student has sufficiently completed their candidacy exam, each SAC member (including
the advisor) will indicate “Satisfactory” via GRADFORMS.
Guidelines for the “Proposal” option for Ph.D. Candidacy: Student, advisor, and SAC choose a proposal
topic. Students are encouraged to prepare one or more abstract(s) to send to the SAC. The Abstract(s)
should include an overview of the proposed topic, the hypothesis they intend to investigate, proposed
specific aims, and the justification or appropriateness of the topic as a grant proposal. The topic for the
proposal will typically be unrelated to the students’ dissertation research. However, in consideration of
the student’s particular situation and with recommendation of the SAC, the proposal can be written on a
topic related to the student’s dissertation research. Within one week of sending the SAC the proposal
Abstract(s) each member must approve/disapprove of the proposal topic(s) in writing.
Once all SAC members approve a proposal topic, the one-month written portion of the candidacy exam
begins. Preparation of the written proposal must follow the most current proposal format requirements
of NSF, USDA-NIFA or as determined by the SAC.
At the end of the one-month written exam period the proposal is given to each member of the SAC.
Within one week of receiving the proposal, each SAC member must give the student written
approval/disapproval. This is equivalent to passing the written part of the general exam.
Upon SAC approval of the written proposal the student must register for the oral exam with the
Graduate School. The Graduate School requires notice of at least two weeks. Prior to one week before