354
AIMS Environmental Science Volume 10, Issue 3, 341–355.
3. Cheng BJ, Zhou Y, Ma Y, et al. (2022) Association between atmospheric particulate matter and
emergency room visits for cerebrovascular disease in Beijing, China. J Environ Health Sci Eng
20: 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00776-w
4. Syahirah MM, Rashid M, Nor Ruwaida J (2016) Total particulate matter, pm10, pm2.5
emissions from palm oil mill boiler. Jurnal Teknologi 78: 6–11.
5. Chong WC, Rashid M, Ramli M, et al. (2014) Effect of flue gas recirculation on multi-cyclones
performance in reducing particulate emission from palm oil mill boiler. Particul Sci Technol 32:
291–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2013.856360
6. Bogodage SG, Leung AYT (2015) CFD simulation of cyclone separators to reduce air pollution.
Powder Technol 286: 488–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.08.023
7. Elsayed K, Lacor C (2012) Modeling and Pareto optimization of gas cyclone separator
performance using RBF type artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Powder Technol
217: 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2011.10.015
8. Funk PA, Elsayed K, Yeater KM, et al. (2015) Could cyclone performance improve with
reduced inlet velocity? Powder Technol 280: 211–218.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.04.026
9. Park D, Go JS (2020) Design of cyclone separator critical diameter model based on machine
learning and CFD. Processes 8: 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8111521
10. Pandey S, Brar LS (2022) On the performance of cyclone separators with different shapes of the
conical section using CFD. Powder Technol 407: 117629.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117629
11. Pandey SI, Saha O, Prakash T, et al. (2022) CFD Investigations of cyclone separators with
different cone heights and shapes. Appl Sci 12: 4904. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104904
12. Youn JS, Han S, Yi JS, et al. (2021) Development of PM10 and PM2.5 cyclones for small
sampling ports at stationary sources: Numerical and experimental study. Environ Res 193:
110507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110507
13. Duran JZ, Caldona, EB (2020) Design of an activated carbon equipped-cyclone separator and its
performance on particulate matter removal. Particul Sci Technol 38: 694–702.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2019.1607637
14. Hayashi T, Lee TG, Hazelwood M, et al. (2000) Characterization of activated carbon fiber filters
for pressure drop, submicrometer particulate collection, and mercury capture. J Air Waste
Manag Assoc 50: 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464136
15. Shanmuganathan S, Johir MA, Nguyen TV, et al. (2015) Experimental evaluation of
microfiltration–granular activated carbon (MF–GAC)/nano filter hybrid system in high quality
water reuse. J Membr Sci 476: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.009
16. Ma L, He M, Fu P, et al. (2020) Adsorption of volatile organic compounds on modified spherical
activated carbon in a new cyclonic fluidized bed. Sep Purif Technol 235: 1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116146
17. Hamzah MH, Ahmad Asri MF, Che Man H, et al. (2019) Prospective application of palm oil mill
boiler ash as a biosorbent: effect of microwave irradiation and palm oil mill effluent
decolorization by adsorption. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16: 3453.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183453