Illinois State University Illinois State University
ISU ReD: Research and eData ISU ReD: Research and eData
Theses and Dissertations
3-25-2020
No “Me ” before the Nation: Portrayal of Nationalism and No “Me ” before the Nation: Portrayal of Nationalism and
Religious Identities in Bollywood Movies Created during Modi-era Religious Identities in Bollywood Movies Created during Modi-era
Misha Khan
Illinois State University
Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd
Part of the Communication Commons
Recommended Citation Recommended Citation
Khan, Misha, "No “Me ” before the Nation: Portrayal of Nationalism and Religious Identities in Bollywood
Movies Created during Modi-era" (2020).
Theses and Dissertations
. 1294.
https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1294
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for
inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more
information, please contact [email protected].
NO “ME” BEFORE THE NATION: PORTRAYAL OF NATIONALISM AND RELIGIOUS
IDENTITIES IN BOLLYWOOD MOVIES CREATED DURING MODI-ERA
MISHA KHAN
83 Pages
This study analyzed three Bollywood films, Raazi, PM Narendra Modi, and Gully Boy,
that were released during the administration of the current Prime Minister of India, PM Narendra
Modi. The research questions focused on the portrayal of nationalism and religious identities in
the analyzed films. The recurring theme in all three films remained to be nationalism However,
drawing on the past research, this study found an existing intertwined relationship between the
portrayed nationalism and religious identities. Other central themes in the films included
patriarchy, the notion of Othering, and class hegemony. This study draws added implications
through its results and past research in the area.
KEYWORDS: Media Representation, Nationalism, Religious Identity, Bollywood
NO “ME” BEFORE THE NATION: PORTRAYAL OF NATIONALISM AND RELIGIOUS
IDENTITIES IN BOLLYWOOD MOVIES CREATED DURING MODI-ERA
MISHA KHAN
A Thesis Submitted in Partial
Fulfillment of the Requirements
for the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
School of Communication
ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY
2020
© 2020 Misha Khan
NO “ME” BEFORE THE NATION: PORTRAYAL OF NATIONALISM AND RELIGIOUS
IDENTITIES IN BOLLYWOOD MOVIES CREATED DURING MODI-ERA
MISHA KHAN
COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
John R. Baldwin, Chair
Megan Hopper
Philip Chidester
i
ACKNOWLEGMENTS
I would like to thank my advisor Dr. John Baldwin for his kindness, guidance, and
support throughout my journey as a graduate student, and specifically in shaping this project and
steering me into right direction when I needed. I also owe many thanks to my committee
members, Dr. Phil Chidester and Dr. Megan Hopper, for their feedback and guidance. I am
deeply grateful to the wonderful people of School of Communication: To Dr. Andrew
Ventimiglia, for his guidance and all the resources, Dr. Kevin Meyer, for his support during my
admission process and being a wonderful advisor, and Dr. Cheri Simonds, for being a great
supervisor and mentor.
I would like to thank the two amazing people I lost this past year, but I know would have
been proud of my progress; Nawaz Baloch and Wahid Baksh, thank you for teaching me the
value of education, and for many other life lessons. I would like to pay my deepest gratitude to
my parents. Aslam and Raheela. Baba, I would not have been where I am without you, thank you
for believing in me. Mama, thank you for your unconditional love and support. I would like to
thank my siblings, Sara and Taha, for the love and much needed laughs. I would also like to
thank Hasnaa Touita, for being a wonderful friend, and Gilbert Kipkoech for being a dear friend
and mentor.
M.K.
ii
CONTENTS
Page
ACKNOWLEGMENTS
i
CONTENTS
ii
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
1
Modi Era
3
Conclusion
6
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW
7
Globalization and Bollywood
7
Nationalism in Bollywood
8
Post-Colonialism
10
Media and National Identity
13
Representation of Other
14
Orientalism
18
Re-Orientalism
20
Conclusion
23
CHAPTER III: METHOD
24
Text
24
PM Narendra Modi
24
Raazi
26
Gully Boy
28
Data Analysis
29
Conclusion
30
iii
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS AND RESULT
31
Nationalism
31
Nationalistic Identity
31
Sacrifice
35
Nation Before Everything
37
Religion
45
Raazi
45
PM Narendra Modi
45
Gully Boy
48
Othering
50
Raazi
50
Gully Boy
51
PM Narendra Modi
51
Class Hegemony
52
PM Narendra Modi
52
Gully Boy
53
Patriarchy
56
Raazi
56
PM Narendra Modi
57
Gully Boy
57
Conclusion
63
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION
65
Research Questions
65
iv
Religious Identity
65
Nationalism
65
Religious Identity and Nationalism
66
Other Key Findings
67
Implications
71
Conclusion
73
REFERENCES
74
1
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
Home to some of the world's most ancient surviving civilizations, the Indian subcontinent
spreads vast from the mountainous Afghan frontier to the jungles of Burma and the coral ranges
of the Indian Ocean. It is varied in terms of people, languages, and religious and cultural
traditions. Specifically, India is known to be the land of many religions. It is the birthplace of
four major religions: Hinduism, Sikhism, Jainism, and Buddhism (Hansen & Parpola, 1986). It
has the second highest population of Muslims in the world, next only to Indonesia (Masci, 2017).
The rich history and culture of the Indian subcontinent has always captured the attention
of the world. The whole world was left intrigued about the future of the Indian subcontinent
when the British rulers agreed upon its split. In 1947, India was officially split into two
independent nations, Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan. Following the violent
partition of the Indian subcontinent, with estimated death toll of one to two million people
(Guardian, 2017) began the vastly complex and largely hostile relationship between the two
neighbors.
Soon after their independence, India and Pakistan established diplomatic relations.
However, the violent partition and numerous territorial claims have always overshadowed their
relationship. Since their independence, the two countries have been involved in three major wars,
one undeclared war, and numerous armed skirmishes and military standoffs (Ali & Ripley,
1983). The Kashmir conflict is the center-point of all these conflicts, with the exception of the
Indo-Pakistan War of 1971 and Bangladesh Liberation War, which resulted in the secession of
East Pakistan (Cavendish, 2007).
Before the British split the Indian subcontinent, there was no Bollywood. There was just
Indian cinema, an industry that was liked equally by subjects of the British Raj. Even after the
2
Partition in 1947, the cinema industries of India and Pakistan were not entirely split, but set on
alternate paths. The reach of Bollywood cinema is not limited to the enormous 1.37 billion
Indian population but has left a spell on audiences all over the globe (“How worried should we
be?,” n.d.). Interestingly, Pakistan is among the biggest consumers of Bollywood films outside of
India (Ahmad, 2019).
Several Bollywood films over the last 72 years have attempted to appeal to the people of
India’s sense of nationalism, patriotism, and self-sacrifice for the nation. The subjects have
ranged from freedom struggle and invasions to battles, sports, ancient and medieval history, and
insurgency. The common theme running across these films has been pride in being Indian and
duty towards the nation. As early as 1876, the administration of Lord Northbrook had broadcast
the Dramatic Performances Act to stamp out treason on stage (Rajadhyaksha, 2003). The British
similarly kept a watchful eye on the films, through the Censor office and Police.
With independence declared on August 15, 1947, things started taking a different turn.
More films on nationalism started emerging, showcasing the struggle of a country that had
emerged independent through a protracted freedom struggle. Films such as Shaheed (Martyr),
Samadhi (Brother-in-law), and Pehla Aadmi (First Man), allegedly based on a true incident
surrounding with the struggle of independence were the first ones to surface (IMDB, 2017). In
1952, Anand Math was released, based on a famous novel and directed by Hemen Gupta, a
former freedom fighter who had spent years in jail and allegedly escaped hanging. He later
turned to the making of films (“Top ten patriotic Indian movies,” 2012).
Bollywood films acquired a life of their own when freedom came. In the 1960s, it started
to become apparent that the challenges India needed to solve were not merely internal; they
sometimes needed military response. The Goa Liberation War (1961), Indo-China war (1962),
3
and Indo-Pakistan war (1965) were of the 1960s (“India-China war of 1962,” 2016). Another
Indo-Pakistan War was followed in 1971. A string of military films followed this, including
Haqeeqat (1964), Humsaya (1968), Prem Pujari (1970), Lalkar (1972), Hindustan ki Kasam
(1973), Vijeta (1982), and Akraman (1975). Late in the 20
th
century, films such as Prahaar: The
Final Attack (1991), Border (1997), LoC Kargil (2003), Tango Charlie (2005), Shaurya (2008),
1971 (2007), and Ghazi Attack (2017) were created. These films were also based on the India-
Pakistan wars. More films, such as Lagaan (2001), Chak De India (2007), Bhag Milkha Bhag
(2013), and Dangal (2016), used sports to raise patriotic feelings (“INDIAN WAR AND
PATRIOTIC MOVIES,” 2017).
Patriotism did not lose its appeal on film makers in the 21
st
century. This is proven by the
fact that, in the year 2002, three Hindi films were produced based on Bhagat Singh, a freedom
fighter from the pre-independence era. Later in that decade more than ten films were released on
similar topics (“Top ten patriotic Indian movies,” 2012).
Modi-Era
In May 2014, India’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won a majority at a general election
after 30 years of coalition governments, leading to the appointment of Narendra Modi as the 14
th
Prime Minister of India (India Times, 2014). Ever since his victory, PM Modi has been accused
of using propaganda to win elections by his opponents and various print media publications. An
example is the publication of an Indian magazine called Open with the cover story about the
victory headlined “Triumph of the Will.” This is also the name of a 1935 propaganda film by
German auteur Leni Riefenstahl that was commissioned by the leader of the Nazi Party, Adolf
Hitler (South China Morning Post, 2019). In January of 2019 alone, three mainstream Hindi
films directly channeled Modi’s positions, policies, or rhetoric (Jamkhandikar, 2019). In the film,
4
The Accidental Prime Minister, Modi’s predecessor Manmohan Singh is portrayed as a puppet of
the prominent Nehru-Gandhi family, known to be first family of Indian politics as three of its
members have been prime minister (BBC, 2019). The BJP’s approval of the film was made quite
clear when it shared a link to the trailer on its official Twitter account (BJP, 2018).
The second film, Uri: The Surgical Strike, dramatized a secret operation conducted by
the Indian military against Pakistan in 2016 (IMDB). In the film, a prime minister who is
unnamed but looks like Modi is shown as a caring man who stays up late to see how the
operation ended and congratulates the team. On January 19, 2019, when Modi officially opened
the National Museum of Indian Cinema in Mumbai, he greeted the audience with a line from the
film: “How’s the josh (energy)?” (South China Morning Post, 2019).
The third film is Manikarnika, an epic period drama based on the life of the queen of a
19th-century princely state who battled the British as part of a series of uprisings across colonial
India that came to be known as the Revolt of 1857. “The difference between you and me is that
you want to rule, and I want to serve my people,” the title character says to a British officer in
the film (Chotiner, 2019). This distinction between ruler and public servant is one that Modi
likes to make when comparing himself to the Nehru-Gandhis, often referencing his own humble
background as a chaiwala (tea seller).
Elsewhere in the movie, Manikarnika saves a calf from “becoming steak” for the British.
Modi’s tenure as prime minister has been marked by a large number of horrific killings known as
cow lynching, in which people are murdered on suspicion of eating beef or taking a cow for
slaughter (BBC, 2019). Cows are sacred primarily to upper-caste Hindus, yet beef is a cheap
source of protein for many lower-caste communities. India is also home to the world’s second
5
largest population of Muslims, as well as a small percentage of Christians. Both these
communities eat beef (Doniger, 2019).
The Modi references do not end there. A biopic on the prime minister named PM
Narendra Modi was also released right before Modi was elected as the Prime Minister for the
second time (Thakur, 2019). Another film, Mere Pyare Prime Minister (My Dear Prime
Minister), tells the story of a child from a slum who wants to build a toilet for his single mother.
Toilets form an integral part of Modi’s flagship Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India
Campaign). Other films to broach the subject include 2017’s Toilet: A Prem Katha (Toilet: A
Love Story) about a young wife who demanded a toilet in her marital home, sparking a sanitation
and social revolution. This film directly references Modi’s toilet campaign while also expressing
admiration for his controversial demonetization of the 500- and 1,000-rupee currency notes
(South China Morning Post, 2019).
Last year, Indian cinema giant Yash Raj Films released Sui Dhaaga (Needle and Thread),
appreciating Modi’s Make-in-India and Startup India campaigns, with its against-all-odds
narrative of a young couple’s small entrepreneurial venture. One of the Modi’s most resonant
election campaign promises was that he would create 10 million jobs per year (IMDB). In 2018,
Modi said 7 million jobs had been created in India, arguably the highest in his tenure as prime
minister. Modi has indirectly admitted in a television interview that he considered someone
selling small street snacks to be gainfully employed. Sui Dhaaga seemed to channel this self-
employment narrative (Jha, 2018).
There has, in general, been a noticeable increase in nationalistic films over the past five
or six years. In 2019 alone, more than ten Bollywood films on the topic of patriotism are being
released (“Here are 10 Upcoming Patriotic,” 2019). Mostly, this takes the form of the sports
6
drama, which offers a loving vessel for nationalism and its iconography unfurling the flag,
singing the national anthem, and other such displays. Modern action films also often feature plots
about threats to national security or the adventures of the country’s many fighting forces.
Moreover, even social dramas and love stories are seasoned with such themes; romantic heroes
in some Hindi films work on projects of national importance, such as education or finding
solutions to women’s health issues.
Right-wing populism in democracies all over the world including the Philippines,
Hungary, Poland, Turkey, United Kingdom, and the United States seems to be on the rise since
the beginning of mid-2010’s (Merelli, 2019). When Modi’s right-wing Hindu nationalist party
came into power in India in 2014, the ever-existing portrayal of nationalism in the Bollywood
film industry seemingly increased. The cinema industry, which holds a lot of power over its
audience, can serve as tool to influence and amend their thoughts and behaviors.
Conclusion
This chapter has provided an overview of the circumstances leading to the partition of
India and Pakistan, summarized Bollywood movies based on nationalism, and described the face
of Indian cinema since the inauguration of PM Modi. The next chapter provide a deeper
understanding of Bollywood’s impact on its audience and the representation of nationalism and
religious nationalism in Bollywood. The broader representations of minorities in media
described.
7
CHAPTER II: LITERATURE REVIEW
To understand the representation of nationalism and religious nationalism in Bollywood
movies, it is important to review the existing literature on the Bollywood industry, the concepts
of nationalism and religious nationalism, and the process of Othering through movies. This
chapter provide a deeper understanding of the current global standing of Bollywood film
industry, the already explored themes of nationalism in Bollywood movies, the existing
relationship between media and national identity, and the concept of Orientalism and Re-
Orientalism.
Globalization and Bollywood
Bollywood is not limited to India. In the past few decades it has gone global, and with
this global presence the influence of Bollywood on its viewers has increased massively.
Globalization has brought an increase in transnational commodification of culture and opened
new avenues of cultural dissemination. Bollywood has not only turned into a symbol of popular
Asian culture, but its enormous amount of production has made it the largest cinema industry in
the world. Bollywood produces nearly 1,000 films every year, which is approximately double
that of Hollywood productions (Matusitz & Payano, 2011). Kaur and Sinha (2005) believe that,
if Hollywood signifies the standardized effects of American capitalism in global culture,
Bollywood maps the contrasting move of globalization in popular culture. Studying Bollywood
films within global context enables the understanding of the conceptual frameworks developed
for Hollywood narratives such as audience voyeurism, narrative techniques, and the effect of
Hollywood’s cultural capitalism on Indian cinema (Kaur & Sinha).
Appadurai (1996) outlined the “theory of rupture” (p. 3), which explores the processes of
globalization and transitional identity production. Appadurai’s approach takes media and
8
migration as its twin poles of influence on how modern prejudices are created. Appadurai claims
that electronic media, such as the cinema, create communities of sentiment, referring to the
groups of people that share the same feelings and thoughts, by offering new resources for self-
imagining as an everyday project.
Anderson (1991) viewed nations as imagined communities that can be distinguished by
the style in which they are imagined. He also addressed the cultural roots of these imaginings.
Anderson emphasized the historical role played by the media in enabling communities of readers
to spring up and relate themselves to others in profoundly new ways. He noted the important role
played by fiction, which ‘‘seeps quietly and continuously into reality, creating that remarkable
confidence of community in anonymity which is the hallmark of modern nations’’ (p. 36).
Takhar, Maclaran, and Lorna (2012) explain how the globalization of Bollywood affects
the Indian diaspora at a local level. Bollywood provides an important space for negotiating and
reconciling various tensions between family-based and more individualistic value systems.
Takhar et al. argue that Bollywood speaks to the diaspora by conveying a new sense of “Indian-
ness,” one that is less about citizenship and more about imagined identity and community. They
investigated what they termed the “Indian imaginary”, and how the values embedded within
them impacted the lives of young British Sikhs. Takhar et al. found that Bollywood offers young
British Sikhs a hybridized representation of courtship and marriage that is both romantic and
familial and that serves to reconcile Eastern and Western marital relationship ideals and
oppositional cultural discourses.
Nationalism in Bollywood
Bollywood films are not solely politically motivated, nor are they entirely devoid of
nationalist/anti-colonialist content; however, they are ideologically loaded (Tyrrell, 2004). The
9
current Bollywood is the face of post-global India. Ganti (2004) suggests that Hindi cinema
endorses nationalist projects that centralize the ideal upper middle-class Hindu male and mark
the Muslim man as a sexualized, violent other. Kaur (2002) found that the representations of
India no longer seem to be limited to folk dancers in exotic costumes or the sophisticated
postures of classical danseuse at the “Festivals of India” abroad (Kaur).
Kinnvall (2004) states that nationalism and religion are both “intimately linked to chosen
traumas and chosen glories” (p. 757). This link makes them particularly powerful identity
signifiers in times of uncertain structural conditions, with the implication that they are likely to
become more persuasive rallying points than other identity-signifiers. Kinnvall believes that
there were at least two reasons for this. One can be the link between the history of individualism,
nationalism, and religion; another can be found in the close relationship between
nationalism/religion and hierarchical race/gender structures.
Friedland (2001) views religious nationalism as a discourse and social movement that are
often understood as “an instance of culture's autonomy, a source of identity and critique, or an
autonomy manifested in the formation of politicized religious groups” (p. 130). According to
Friedland, this is the reason that religious nationalism becomes a movement that defends a
specific form of group identity and difference based on the characteristics of individuals. These
group identities can be racial, sexual or gender, or linguistic based, and they initiate movements
to support particularity from the society's dominant group. Friedland states that religious
nationalism serves as an instrument by which religious people secure membership in the political
community or recognition in the public sphere.
Religious nationalism can be understood as a part of the new social movement that
defends national identity, as opposed to pursuing national political or economic interests
(Bonnell & Hunt 1999). Moreover, it can also be understood as a “cultural refraction, or
mediation, of underlying social grievances” (Friedland, 2001, p. 130). These castings are based
on distinguishing the society as a distributional system of things, including culture as an
expressive system of signs, and on understanding the economy as an institutional order and the
epitome of the society (Bonnell & Hunt, 1999). As noted by Reicher and Hopkins (2001), “If
national mobilization depends upon national identity, then establishing identity depends upon
embedding it within an essentializing historical narrative” (p. 51).
Post-Colonialism
Post-Colonialism refers to the period that follows the end of colonialism (Childs &
Williams, 2014). However, there is more to the theory than simple transition from one period to
another. Childs and Williams state that the completion of one historic period and the beginning
of another is difficult to uphold in an unproblematic manner. The colonialization of Indian-
subcontinent by the British played an integral part in the construction of different identities based
on religious beliefs in the region. Chaturvedi (2001) believes that the idea of two self-contained
communities of the Hindus and Muslims in India was only developed with the beginning of
British rule.
The two religious communities were defined, demarcated and demonised in terms of
certain basic differences: Muslims were violent, despotic, and masculine; Hindus were
indolent, passive, and effeminate. Religious identification was accordingly taken as more
than a matter of belief; it determined membership more generally in a larger community
and also offered valid explanations for the way Indians acted. In short, it was the
centrality of religious community, along with that of caste, which for the British marked
out India’s distinctive status as a fundamentally different land and peoples. (p. 150)
The British initiated the creation of communitarian identity in India. According to Hassan
(2000), this was done by asking the people about their religion, past, and tribes. These were new
constructs for the Indians. “The idea of being a Muslim, or being a Brahmin, existed in
preBritish times . . . But the homogenisation of these categories was a British invention” (p.
189).
Van der Veer (2002) agrees to this notion and states that although a sense of belonging to
specific communities existed in pre-colonial India, the relative stabilization of Hindu and
Muslim shared identities was mostly a consequence of colonial rule. According to Babar (2002),
the colonial policy of "divide and rule" did not invent these communal identities from scratch:
Emerging colonial state, confronted with the task of governing a vast population and
territory, had to devise mechanisms for the legitimation of its rule as well as to simplify
what it claimed to be an indecipherable complexity of castes and communities having
specific characteristics and tendencies. Historians have pointed out that the division of
the Indian population into discrete religious communities constituted an integral strategy
of colonial practice. This is apparent in many aspects of colonial administration,
especially in the sphere of legal institutions and practices. (p. 64)
In the attempt to standardize and decode indigenous law of the Indian subcontinent, the
British rulers ended up creating a distinction between Hindu and Muslim laws (Babar, 2002).
The census held by the British about religious laws further established these distinctions in terms
of a Hindus being majority and Muslims as minority, this became the basis of electoral,
representative politics in the sub-continent (Babar).
In India, Bollywood acts as a key player in shaping the nation, its meaning, and
signifying its internal and external borders. Rajadhyaksha (2003) notes how, after independence,
Hindi cinema assembled a national market through the construction of unified, national,
gendered, racialized, and (hetero)sexed subject. According to Rajadhyaksha, in many parts of
India, the cinema hall has been the only space that was not divided along caste lines.
Contemporary Hindi films creates a glossy `homeland' to the Indian residing around the globe
and presents diasporic space as the paradise for the consumer to. According to Mohammad
(2006), the concerns in India over the relationship of modernity and consumption to Indian
(Hindu) values and identity are ones that the entertainment industries in India needed to address
and negotiate (Mohammad, 2006).
The history of the relationship between India and Pakistan is not short of wars and
conflicts. India and Pakistan had three wars during 1947-48, 1965, and 1971 (Ganguly, 1995).
The first two wars between India and Pakistan were a consequence of the Kashmir issue, which
is a direct repercussion of partition of the Indian sub-continent at the end of the colonial era. The
third war was due to India’s intervention in Pakistan’s internal crisis which led to the creation of
Bangladesh (Ganguly). The division of West and East Pakistan or current Pakistan and
Bangladesh is also an extension of issues formed at the end of the British colonial-era.
Despite the ongoing tensions among the two nations, India and Pakistan have not been
involved in a war during the past few decades; However, multiple Bollywood films created in
recent times contain the reference to the previous wars to incite nationalism among the Indian
viewers. Bollywood films with nationalistic themes are not limited to the stories surrounding
military achievements and Indo-Pakistan wars; some films focusing on the themes of colonialism
have also been created. One of the examples of the portrayal of nationalism in Bollywood is the
film Rang De Basanti (2006). The film places anti-colonial nationalism within the justificatory
context of political violence. Rang De Basanti presents a historical narrative that recuperates
political violence as a crucial moment in the Indian nationalist struggle, by focusing on the
revolutionaries who were members of the Hindustan Socialist Republican Association (Army)
and who are little studied by historians of the nationalist period (Sirivastava, 2009).
Media and National Identity
National identity explains the demonstration of identifying with nation, which means that
it is relevant to draw on theories of cultural in general. According to Triandafyllidou (1998):
The nation remains the most relevant form of collective identity. The basic propositions
of the nationalist doctrine, namely that the world is divided into nations and that the
nation is the only legitimate source of political power, are accepted as uncontested
principles which guide the development of social and political life. Not only the
organization of the world in nation-states seem ‘natural’ but the whole perception by each
individual of the surrounding world is based on the distinction between the ingroup,
namely the nation, and the foreigners, those belonging to other communities, the
“others.” (p. 293)
The notion of the Other is essential in the nationalist doctrine. For nationalists, the
existence of their own nation presupposes the existence of other nations too. Traditional cultural
forms and practices of the nation are complemented, and increasingly replaced in their affective
power, by meanings, images and activities drawn from popular culture. However, this does not
make the tradition-bound rituals and other cultural elements irrelevant. According to Ednsor
(2002), now their power largely depends on their redistribution through popular culture, where
these cultural and traditional rituals blend with countless other iconic cultural elements which
signify the nation in multiple and contested ways.
Madison (1999) writes that European American audiences are generally less interested in
shows led by African American actors. Moreover, when European Americans watch
“multiethnic” shows, they mostly watch shows that feature European Americans as leads. The
representation of Others has been tied up in long-established signifying practices that are slow to
change because of systemic media constraints (Fursich, 2010). According to Fursich, if culture is
seen as a dynamic process, the media should be situated as institutions that allow for cultural
development, and as “enablers and not simply as preservers of cultural diversity” (p. 124).
Moreover, makers of media policy and regulation aimed at securing cultural diversity need to be
aware of the detrimental effect of censorship and restriction on expression of cultural diversity.
As Magder (2004) points out, “Cultural diversity is enhanced when individuals can express
themselves freely and receive forms of expression from the broadest possible range of sources,
within and across frontiers. Public policy – whether domestic or international – should respect
this principle, first and foremost” (p.393).
Representation of the Other
Numerous studies have shown mass media to articulate dominant social values,
ideologies, and developments, and that these characteristics often lead to misrepresentation or
stereotypical portrayals of minorities in the media. Hartmann and Husband (1974) investigated
ethnic news coverage in Britain during the 1960s and found that the emerging news framework
encouraged the perspective of “people of color” as problems, aberrations, or just oddities. Hall
(1992) found similar results, as Blacks in the UK were symbolized as less civilized and culturally
inferior due to differences in their race and color as compared to the majority. Besides the UK,
scholars investigating race relations in the USA in the 1980s also found stereotypical
representations of Latinos and other minorities in the American press (Totti, 1987). Van Dijk
(1991) analyzed two decades of data investigating the relations between media and minority
groups across North America and Europe and concluded that the media were representative of a
White supremacy, which predominantly depicted minorities as “a problem or a threat, and
mostly in association with crime, violence, conflict, unacceptable cultural differences, or other
forms of deviance” (p. 20).
When it comes to South-Asia, such characterizations can also be seen in Indian media.
Hult and King (2011) found that, since the beginning of the 21
st
century, terrorism has become a
major theme in Bollywood. Bollywood has the power to disseminate and reinforce the already
existing ideology of mistrust towards Muslims in the region. Bollywood movies have created the
stereotypical images of Muslim characters with religious and cultural symbols such as beards,
caps, headscarves, and burqa (Hussein & Hussein, 2015). These stereotypes ignore the social,
economic, cultural, and regional differences in the community. However, the overall
representation of Muslims in Bollywood has undergone varied shifts due to the sociopolitical
situation of the time.
Islam (2007) believes that the characterization and representation of Indian Muslims is
primarily related to the Othering agenda of media in mythologizing and stereotyping the Muslim
Other. However, from the perspective of the media, the Muslim Other has to be identified with
certain cultural symbols. Those cultural symbols do not need to reflect the everyday traits of the
Muslim community in India. Rather, the symbols are often imposed to create a stereotypical and
mythical image and then sold as an idealized form (Islam).
During and after the 1990s, Bollywood created an imaginary version of Hindu nation by
fabricating the Muslim ‘Other’ as the enemy of the nation (Khatun, 2016). Most films portrayed
the ideological conflict between the nationalist victim and the separationist or “terrorist.” This
played an important role in creating an imaginary Muslim identity in the minds of the audience.
Kumar (2013) refers to it as the “techno-cultural transmitter,” which is the synergy between
technology and culture, where technology is used as a pedagogical tool.
The theme of showing Muslims as terrorists in Bollywood movies became popular during
the 1990s (Islam, 2007). However, it was elaborated and diversified during the 2000s, with
certain references to terror events since 9/11. An example of this is popular Bollywood film
Faana (2006). In Faana, one of Bollywood’s biggest stars, Amir Khan, plays the role of a
Kashmiri separatist named Rehan, who acts violently against the Indian nation. The film
mentions the political ideology of India. Fanaa’s cinematic narrative presents the Muslim man in
ways that reaffirm violence and sexuality as both sides of a representational coin which appears
influenced by Orientalism (Khan, 2009).
Bollywood movies usually construct images of their neighbor country, Pakistan, either to
cater the demands of cinema viewers or sometimes also to highlight certain policies that
government wants to promote (Roy 2012). Rasul (2011) states that, in the past, many films have
been produced by Bollywood had anti-Pakistan content. Movies like Border (1997), LOC:
Kargil (2003), and Lakshya (2004) reflected Pakistan as India’s enemy country (Rasul 2011).
The movie LOC: Kargil was so biased that Pakistanis were hardly shown on screen or even
named; they were usually mentioned as rats (Sen, 2005). Gadar: Ek Prem Katha was another
anti-Pakistani movie that was based on the partition of Indian Sub-continent in 1947. This film
broke the box office records at the time of its release in India (Desai, 2005). Another war movie
that depicted the anti-Pakistan content was Lakshya (2004). This movie portrayed the events of
the Kargil war which was fought between Pakistan and India in 1999 (Dudrah, 2012).
Gokulsing and Dissanayake (2012) argued that “the discourse of Indian Popular Cinema
has been evolving steadily over a century in response to newer social developments and
historical conjunctures” (p. 17). For example, cinema in India has repeatedly addressed queer
representations through stereotyped depictions and ambiguous gendered side characters in films
such as Raja Hindustani (Indian King) and Laawaaris (Orphans), elemental function of which
appeared to be limited to the provision of comic relief (Dharmesh & Darshan, 1996).
Alternatively, a modest number of commercial films presenting queer narratives is also in
existence, which, in contrast emphasize the disconsolate or the tragic. The films My Brother
Nikhil and I Am, which take HIV and gay bashing/blackmailing as their major themes, are
perhaps the most well-known examples of this genre. Another film that can be looked at as queer
text is Dostana (friendship). However, Dasgupta (2015) stated that, while Dostana represents
queer possibilities existing within the Indian culture and society, it also plays with the negative
and positive attributes that we might associate with these characters.
Globally, numerous scholars across disciplines have investigated media representation of
Muslims and Islam through various lenses of analytical inquiry, and across varying geo-political
contexts. Ahmed and Matthes (2016) presented a meta-analysis of 345 academic studies
pertaining to media representations of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015. They found that,
Post 9/11, international media focused intensively on Muslims and Islam and the Middle East in
particular. This thematic pattern linking Muslims and Islam with terrorism, violence, and
orthodoxy ideals highlights religion as a threat.
Muslims are often framed as heartless, brutal, uncivilized, religious fanatics; as militants
and terrorists; or as societal problems, within well-constructed war and conflict stories (Shaheen,
2009). Islam is presented from the perspective of a “White man’s world,” and Muslims are
categorized as “them” and presented as a threat to “us” (Osuri & Banerjee, 2004, p. 167;
Abrams, 1988). A social group is a set of individuals who hold a common social identification or
view themselves as members of the same social category. Through a social comparison process,
persons who are similar to the self are categorized with the self and are labeled the in-group;
persons who differ from the self are categorized as the out-group (Sets & Burke, 2000). Despite
living together for a long time, Muslims and Hindus of Indian subcontinent have categorized
themselves as a part of different groups on the basis of their religious identities. This grouping
has led to the formation of the notion of ingroup and outgroup in India. Moreover, this existence
of ingroup and outgroup is somewhat evident in Bollywood films, specifically through the
portrayal of its neighboring country, Pakistan.
Orientalism
This depiction of Muslims as “them” or “others” reflects Edward Saids (1978) notion of
Orientalism. Said identified the processes of Orientalism and the relationship between power and
dominance where the Oriental was “submitted to being-made the Oriental” (p. 14). Said coined
the term Orientalism to refer to the hegemonic patterns of representation of “Oriental” cultures
and societies as “backward” and “traditional” in order to construct Europe (or the West) as
“modern” and “progressive.” The Orient was constantly stigmatized as naturally different from
the Occident. This process of othering drew a strict boundary between East and West, and it
became “the starting point for elaborate theories, epics, novels, social descriptions, and political
accounts concerning the Orient, its people, customs, ‘mind’, destiny, and so on” (pp. 2-3).
The concept of Orientalism often resonates with the ideals of “racism, Islamophobia,
selective prejudice, model minoritizing, and other doctrines of civilization differences” (Kumar,
2012, p. 233). Kumar argued that the discourse of terrorism is another form of Orientalism. He
explained that this is because terror and torture are frequently denoted as the actions of the Other,
never of ones own. Nayak (2006) believed that the event of 9/11 exposed the underlying anxiety
always present in the US Self, and that 'Arabs' and 'Muslims' are various constructed categories
of Others.
The discursive images of American Orientalism have been profoundly shaped by the
historical context of race relations in the domestic U.S. homefront, as well as the nation’s
diplomatic relations with Asian countries abroad (Lee, 1999). Although Said (1978) focuses
mainly on Europe’s relations with the Middle East and South Asia, Kim and Chung (2005) argue
that the political ideologies and cultural imageries implicit in such hegemonic dichotomies help
to shed light on the internal dynamics of Orientalism in America. Specifically, American
Orientalism has been sustained by this notion of Western/White power as a means to justify and
exert its cultural domination over Asia and Asian America.
While European Orientalism was supposed to defend the colonization and domination of
the people from the Third World, American Orientalism was initially used to exclude Asian
immigrants from entering or settling in the U.S. (Kim & Chung, 2005). In support of the
exclusion of these prospective immigrants, the mass media started cultivating stereotypes
regarding Asian/Americans for the consumption of the White American public. “Everything
from the aggressive, ominous images of Japanese and Chinese immigrants during the “Yellow
Peril” to more modern depictions of Asian/Americans as the passive “model minority” can be
included in this” (p. 74).
The Yellow Peril stereotype led to the exclusion of Asian immigrants and to the
colonization of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, and the Philippines by the U.S. (Lee, 1999). The
American version of the Yellow Peril offered reason for excluding Asian immigrants, and
continuing U.S. westward expansion beyond the west coast of the United States to Asia and the
Pacific region (Okihiro, 1994). Hoppenstand (1992) states that the most common stereotype of
the Yellow Peril in films, comic books, and cartoons is the “Fu Manchu character, who embodies
everything that westerners feared: Asian mastery of Western knowledge and technique” (p. 437).
Caucasian actors starring as Asians characters in films was a common phenomenon in the
1950s and 1960s (Hoppenstand, 1992). In one of the popular films of the period, The Quiet
American (1958), based on Graham Green’s famous book written three years earlier, the
Caucasian actress Georgia Moll played the part of Phuong, the Vietnamese girlfriend of the war-
weary British foreign correspondent (Hoppenstand).
American Orientalism has existed throughout the U.S. history, but to highlight particular
examples of how Orientalism has been engaged to negotiate black racialization, Jun (2016)
referred to the “contradictory process of negotiation as ‘Black Orientalism’ in an attempt to name
the critical dilemma that the struggle for Black citizenship (or black political modernity)
embodies” (p. 1094).
Re-Orientalism
Orientalism still exists in both popular and institutional construction of culture and
identity. However, it has followed a more interesting course over the last few decades (Lau &
Mendes, 2012). Specifically, Said’s (1979) influential arguments have drawn sharp criticism and
generated a worldwide scholarly debate about the nature of modernity, colonialism, and empire.
In particular, some have argued that Said’s concept of Orientalism does not account for the
potential for Orientals themselves to use Orientalism in their self-definition (Zeydanlıoğlu,
2008).
Lau (2009) discusses the notion of re-Orientalism, which views the Orientals as the
perpetrators of Orientalism no less than the non-Orientals, stating that Orientals themselves
perpetrate certain and selective types of Orientalism. Said’s (1979) Orientalism studied how
West constructs the Orient and Occident; re-Orientalism focuses on “how cultural producers with
eastern affiliations come to terms with an Orientalized East” (Lau & Mendas, 2012, p. 1). This is
done by complying with perceived expiations of western readers, by playing along with them or
by discarding them altogether.
Zeydanlıoğlu (2008) states that there is an intimate and complicit relationship between
Orientalism and nationalism, Breckenridge and Veer (1993) refer to this relationship as the “the
avatar of Orientalism” (p. 12). The combination of Orientalism and nationalism in the
hegemonic discourse is not an exception, as it is a manifestation of Orientalist thinking. When
nationalist elites project the internalized Orientalism “inwards” as part of the nation building
process, the “native” emerges as “Other” that becomes the target of “corrective” and “scientific”
projects of modernity and progress. The transformation of the native is undertaken through a
return to the “disciplinary narratives of the West” (Soğuk, 1993: 374).
Lau (2009) argued that the representations of South Asia, South Asian culture, and South
Asian women by women writers contain the representations which emphasize and explore the
sensitivities, mindsets, expectations, and characteristics of South Asian women. These identities
are largely created from within South Asia by the diasporic writers and imposed upon South
Asians as representative of their identity, or at least, a significant part of their identity
construction.
Mudambi (2013) studied the popular Bollywood movie Slumdog Millionaire through the
lens of Orientalism and Othering and found that, although the film brings attention to the social
ills that exists in the Indian society, the process of “(an)Othering,” through the construction of
global publics, shifts the focus away from the need for real social change that goes beyond the
sentimental fantasy.
Schein (1997) explained the term “self-orientalism” as the “adoption of Western
orientalist logics and premises for self-representation in the course of Asian processes of identity
production processes that are complicit, in their mimetic quality, with universalist modernizing
ideologies” (p. 388). Schein found that in the representations of 1980s China, minority women
were filled with contradictions. They were both Othered and incorporated, creating contrast as
well as identity. In popular consciousness, they were objects of an uncertain desire that was
saturated with other meanings, particularly those concerning the tension between tradition and
modernity. “Their imaging betrayed the ascendancy of the Party-as-patriarch over more
egalitarian, horizontal visions of the Chinese social order. It was within this complex and highly
charged ideological context that minority women and men colluded in reproducing their
difference” (p. 403).
The process of Othering from within is not a new phenomenon; research has indicated its
presence in Indian popular culture in the past. India has the largest Hindu population and second
largest Muslim population in the world (Times of India). The segregation in the Indian society
based on religious beliefs has served as decisive in some historic moments of the country. An
example of this can be victory of Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP), a right-wing Hindu nationalist
party, in the past two general elections of India. The impact of the current government
administration on Indian cinema is evident if we look at the new releases of Bollywood.
Although existing research indicates that nationalism in Indian media, whether presented
in Bollywood or otherwise, has been studied by scholars in the past, the subtle shift in the themes
of national identity in the new Bollywood movies is yet to be explored. Moreover, the religious
aspects of nationalism in Bollywood are also not adequately studied in the past. This paper
explores the renewed depiction of nationalism and national identity, specifically when combined
with religion, in Bollywood films. The study focuses on the films produced and released during
the reign of current Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi.
Mainly, this study focuses on the representation of nationalism in Bollywood, and the
frames that are used to present it, seeking to address the following research question:
RQ1: How nationalism is portrayed in Bollywood movies created during Modi-era?
Religion has been seen as the divisive line among the people of Indian-subcontinent for a
long time. With currently a right-wing Hindu nationalist party being in power in India, it is
important to understand how recent movies tackle the subject of religious identities in India.
This idea leads to the second research question:
RQ2: How are religious identities represented in the Bollywood movies created in Modi-
era?
Conclusion
The purpose of this chapter was to summarize existing literature and provide research
questions. Scholars have studied the representation of the people of East or Orientals (as coined
by Edward Said, 1978) by the West or Occident. However, the focus on the representation of
one’s own group has been a comparatively new phenomenon. This study explores a version of
this concept and attempts to understand how different identities within a region are portrayed in
the films.
CHAPTER III: METHOD
The previous chapter provided the theoretical basis for the study with a review of current
literature on the history of sub-continent, existence of nationalism and religious nationalism in
movies, and overall representation of Others in media. Since this study is focused on the
representation of nationalism and religious nationalism in the Bollywood movies. This chapter
explains the text that was studied and the method that utilized for data analysis.
Text
Three Bollywood movies, one released in 2018 and the other two released in 2019,
named Raazi, PM Nareendra Modi, and Gully Boy respectively, were analyzed for the purpose
of this study.
PM Narendra Modi
The film PM Narendera Modi is a biographical drama film based on the life Narender
Modi, the 14
th
Prime Minister of India. Although the film fared well in the box office, it received
a lot of criticism due to its topic, release timing, and depiction of the protagonist.
Production company. PM Narendra Modi was produced by an independent production
company called “Legend Global Studio.” The company has produced two other films. One of
these films, which is also the first film produced by the company, is on the topic of war between
India and Pakistan (Legend Global Studio, n.d.).
Bio-pic or hagiography. Critics termed the film as a “hagiography” and stated that film
had a clear bias towards the protagonist (CNN, 2019; India Today, 2019). The film was
originally supposed to be released on April 11
th
, 2019, more than a month prior the general
election in India. However, one day before the election, its release was postponed by the Election
Commission of India, as it was claimed to be violating the model of code of conduct of elections
(Election Commission of India, 2019). The Election Commission of India stated that:
Any biopic material in nature of biography sub-serving the purpose of any political entity
or any individual entity connected to it, which has potential to disturb level playing field
during the election, should not be displayed in electronic media including cinematograph
during the operation of MCC. (Business Today, 2019)
The film was finally released worldwide on May 24
th
, five days after the election day
(Kumar, 2019). The trailer and posters were being circulated in the country since January of
2019. However, a new poster was released a day before the eventual release of the film with tag
line, Aa rahe hain dobaram ab koi nahin rok sakta, translated: “I am coming back again, nobody
can stop me now” (Times of India, 2019).
Plot. The film revolves around the life of the current Prime Minister of India, Narendra
Modi. Modi starts his career as a chaiwala (tea seller) and later goes on to become a Sanyasi
(Hindu religious mendicant) in the Himalayas. He returns to from the Himalayas and becomes
the leader of a volunteer right-wing Hindu nationalist parliamentary organization and later joins
his current party, the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP).
Modi is portrayed an extremely driven man who has a humble beginning, but he becomes
the Chief Minister of Gujarat (Westernmost state of India), and later the Prime Minister of India,
due to his hard work and determination. When he is young, he is shown fighting alongside the
Indian Army against the terrorists in Kashmir region. When he takes the role of the Chief
Minister of Gujarat, he portrayed as an excellent administer who builds roads, bring employment
opportunities and investment from abroad, eliminates corruption, and handled the 2002’s Gujarat
riots gracefully.
In reality, many claim that Modi himself was a key player leading to the Gujrat Riots in
2002. Modi promised the construction of Ram Mandir (Hindu temple) at the place of Babari
Masjid (Mosque built in 1528 by the Mughal emperors), but the property was controlled by the
Supreme Court of India which did not allow the construction (Ghessem-Fachand, 2012). The
riots resulted in the death of 1,044 people, with 223 missing, and 2,500 injured. Out of the dead,
790 were Muslims, and 254 were Hindus (South Asia: Gujarat riot death toll revealed , 2005).
The events of 2002 are described as a pogrom by many scholars (Ogden, 2012). Despite this, the
movie portrays Modi as a savior and refers to him as an “ideology” than a person during the film.
Nationalism and religion are shown to be a huge part of Modi’s journey. From his formal
education of Hinduism to his association with Hindu Religious groups, and his physically
fighting “terrorists” in Kashmir to his role as a “servant for his people and country”, there are
numerous references to his ideological attitudes. The film also contains multiple songs that
reference religion, the nation of India, and the determination of the protagonist. The film ends
with Modi taking oath as the 14
th
Prime Minister of India.
Raazi
Raazi is one of the highest-grossing Indian films that feature a female protagonist (Box
office India, 2018). The film won the best film award during the 20
th
International Indian Film
Academy Awards (The Guardian, 2019). The film is based on a novel called Calling Sehmat.
The film was released on 11
th
May, 2018. The timing of the release of this film is crucial
since it was around the time of India-Pakistan border skirmishes in Kashmir and retaliatory
strikes. The film was banned for release in Pakistan by the Censor Board of Pakistan, due to its
content and the political situation (Dailytimes, 2018).
Production Company. Raazi was produced under the banner of “Dharma Production,”
which is India’s top production house. The production company has produced more than 35
films on a wide-range of topics (Dharma Production, n.d.)
Plot. The film revolves around a strong female protagonist, Sehmat, who is the daughter
of a Kashmiri Indian freedom fighter. She marries a Pakistani army officer in order to spy on
Pakistan during the India-Pakistan war of 1971. During her time in Pakistan, she develops a
communication channel in India but starts falling in love with her husband who has no clue of
her actual identity. She discovers important information about Pakistan planning an offense
against India and kills her servant and her brother in law. Soon, Pakistan’s Intelligence Agencies
start cracking down on the area, and several accomplices of Sehmat are arrested.
Sehmat is eventually discovered as a spy by her husband, who confronts her with the
police. However, Sehmat’s team from Indian Army arrives for her recue, and her husband dies
from a grenade launched by them. Sehmat finally returns to India and delivers her husband’s
child. Through information provided by Sehmat, the Indian Army sinks a Pakistani submarine,
which starts the India-Pakistan war of 1971, the surrender of Pakistan, and the birth of a new
country, Bangladesh. Sehmat’s son is later shown as an Indian Army officer.
The film takes the journey of a twenty-year-old girl, who changes the map of South-Asia.
Sehmat is shown as a patriotic hero who goes far and beyond to serve her country. The ideology
of nationalism runs in her family, from her father to her son. The film also takes an interesting
perspective on religion, as the protagonist and her family are originally Kashmiri Muslims. This
gives a message that the Kashmiri Muslims also hold patriotism towards the state of India. The
portrayal of India-Pakistan relationship and the overall representation of Pakistan are also very
interesting, and again, the Indian nationalist ideology seems to play a major role in the movie.
Gully Boy
The film Gully Boy is a coming-of-age film about an aspiring rapper. The film can be
described as a unique effort towards closing gap between the Indian hip-hop and the mainstream
(Balram, 2019). Gully Boy was released on 14
th
February, 2019, in India, and it is one of the
highest-grossing films overseas for the year of 2019 (Barlam). One of the songs of the film,
named “Jingoism,” has been deemed controversial by a few film critics, and it has been accused
of holding anti-nationalistic sentiments (Aithal, 2019).
Production Company. Gully Boy was produced by “Tiger Baby Films,” which is owned
by Bollywood film directors Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kagti (Zoya Akhtar and Reema Kagti’s…,
2019).
Plot. The film follows the journey of Murad, a final-year college student, who lives in the
slums of Mumbai, India. Murad is fascinated by rap music. Murad has an abusive father, Aftab,
who brings home a much younger second wife. Murad has a longtime girlfriend Safeena, who is
a medical student and routinely meets him in secret. Murad starts writing Rap lyrics when he is
forced to work part-time as a driver for a rich family after his father is injured. Murad’s lyrics are
based on the inequalities that he observes while on the job. Murad soon befriends another rapper,
Sher, and an evolving musician, Sky, and he collaborates on a song with them.
As Aftab's violence towards his wife escalates, Murad decides to leave home with his
mother and work full-time for his uncle. Later, Murad and Sher enter a contest to open for
American rapper Nas’s Mumbai concert, and Murad qualifies to the finals after a successful rap
battle. Murad gains more confidence by interacting with rap fans who appreciate his
performances. Murad finally stands up to Aftab and his uncle when they depreciate his passion.
He wins the contest. The film ends with his opening performance, as his friends, family, and
Safeena watch him proudly in the audience. The film goes beyond class hegemony that exists in
the Indian society, and it focuses on the passion and aspirations of a young man who belongs
from a lower social class.
The three films chosen for the analysis were all released during the reign of the current
Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi. Modi is the leader of the Right-wing Hindu nationalist
political party BJP (Bhartiya Janata Party) (“BJP announces new…”, 2019). Many individuals.
including Indian journalists and Bollywood directors, have expressed concern over the influence
of Modi and right-wing Hindu nationalist agenda on Bollywood films in the recent years
(Dhillon, 2019). Studying the films created during the reign of Modi can help in determining the
existence of embedded messages and their impact in Bollywood films.
Data Analysis
Rhetorical analysis was performed for the purpose of the study. Specifically, the
framework of Burke’s Pentad analysis was used as a guideline for the analysis. Burke’s
theoretical framework compares the reality of life to a certain performance (Pramucitra, 2018).
According to the theory, just like in a play, life requires actors, scenes, and more tools to aid
towards the goals. The dramatic assumption helps towards understanding that “humans are
animals that use signs, languages and symbols to form a system that is very important to humans
because humans are the makers of choice” (p. 36).
The pentad analysis consists of five points that are used to understand the text: The
symbol act along with the background or the media to achieve a particular purpose, scene is a
term that defines the concept of background or settings that has a purpose to offer the context of
the action, scene is the place for actors to portray an action that describes the situations of
society, social values, historical causes, or events, and Agent is the actor that performs the action
(West & Turner, 2018). Thje agent may insert personal motivational values such as ideas,
desires, fears, rage, instincts, imaginations, and other expressions and act is a discourse in an
action. The concept of act comes from two things: character and thought. According to West and
Turner (2018), Human character disposes themself to act in certain ways that might be a
response to environmental change.
After following the guidelines provided by the framework of a pentad analysis, certain
themes were extracted for the better understanding of the text. The themes that are used to
explain and analyze the data are nationalism, religion, othering, patriarchy, and class hegemony.
First this study provides the description of the relevant scenes, and then analyses of the scenes
are done through the explication of themes and the discourse of the selected texts.
Conclusion
This chapter has presented the procedure that will be followed in this study. The rationale
for the choice of the selected text followed by the brief summary of the texts are provided. The
chapter also described the proposed process of data analysis.
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS AND RESULT
This section contains the analysis of films Raazi, PM Narendra Modi, and Raazi, and
presents the results. For the purpose of the analysis, details of the relevant scenes are provided
with the English translation of dialogues that were originally delivered in Hindi language in the
film, the rhetorical meanings behind the dialogues and scenes are discusses, and conclusion is
drawn from it.
Nationalism
Nationalism can be defined as the attitude that individuals have towards their national
identity, and the actions that they take to achieve political sovereignty (Neilson, 1998).
Nationalism is a prevalent theme in all three films; However, all three films use different lenses
to present nationalism. Depiction of nationalism in all three films is analyzed below:
Nationalistic identity
Nationalism is portrayed as an important individual identity in two out of the three
analyzed films.
Raazi. In the film Raazi, nationalism is depicted as a glorified part of individual’s
identiy. The first scene of Raazi is set at the Arabian Sea. An Indian Army officer is giving a
speech:
It has been 46 years, since the three defense forces of our country came together and won
a war against Pakistan, in 1971, and severed a part of Pakistan away from it. Those senior
officers who have witnessed that war can never forget the sacrifices of that time. Not just
the ones who fought the war – but even those who were miles away from the front –
helping our forces. The brave agents of our Intelligence Bureau. Their glorious feats are
still fresh in my mind. Among them, was a 20-year-old girl – who crossed all imaginable
limits!
The first dialogue of the film discusses the victor of India in Indo-Pakistan war of 1971.
The army officer in the film refers to Bangladesh as a “severed part” which was taken away from
Pakistan. The people involved in the war are referred as “brave” with “glorious” achievements,
who made “sacrifices” and even “crossed all imaginable limits” for their country. The most
prominent theme here is the representation of nationalism as a glorified part of identity building.
As Triandafyllidou (1998) indicates, nationalism still serves as the most binding force for the
formation of collective identity of the society. This identity creates the notion of Other for a
society. This scene emphasizes that sacrificing for the nation is glorious. In another scene of the
film, the protagonist Sehmat is portrayed to be saying, “I am the nation, I am India” which
emphasizes on the national identity being the most important identity of an individual.
In film Raazi, Sehmat is married to a Pakistani Army officer’s son in order to spy in
Pakistan. While Sehmat is in Pakistan, it is revealed that the relations between India and Pakistan
are becoming very hostile. In one of the scenes, Sehmat’s father in law starts to discuss politics
at the dinner table with his family and Sehmat, and he says, “This time there is no chance of a
compromise. They will be scanning the skies, and we will sweep the ground from under their
feet.” Here, the film Raazi is presenting Pakistanis as people who are obsessed with the idea of
hurting India, as the family would not even spare the topic on the dinner table. Listening to this
about India makes Sehmat emotional. Later that night, Sehmat’s husband says to her, “I know
Abba's (Father) words can be painful. Sorry, Sehmat. My family often forgets that India is your
motherland,” revisiting the notion of one’s country remaining an integral part of one’s life no
matter what the situation is, or where one might be.
PM Narendra Modi. Modi repeats the phrase “Jai Hind” throughout the film, which
means “long live India”. This shows that love for India is an essential part of his identity. Modi is
portrayed as a character whose priority is always his country, India. Even when he is a mere tea-
seller as young boy, he salutes every time he sees the Indian flag. When his friend asks him that
why he salutes every time he sees the Indian flag, he responds, “Why do you do this when you
go to the temple?” as he presses both of his hands together and bows his head slightly. The
gesture, pressing both hands against each other and bowing the head, is done by the people
following the Hindu religion whenever they go and pray in the Hindu temple. It donates utmost
respect to their gods. Through this sentence, the film presents the idea that, being a nationalist is
a significant part of Modi’s identity, and country is most important, and its love and respect even
surpasses that of religion for the character of Modi. The film continues to compare Modi’s strong
love for country and his strong association with the Hindu religion on various occasions;
however, country always takes the lead. Modi’s character continues to show respect towards the
Indian flag throughout the film. In one of the scenes, he is shown to be standing up with the
Indian flag when the Indian troops are under attack in Kashmir. Modi does not let the flag down
amidst open fire from the enemies, as he screams, “Bharat matta ki jay” (Hail mother India).
Moreover, when the riots break in Gujarat (state in India), Modi says out loud, “This (Indian)
flag will wave in every corner of the country. India will not be afraid of terror; terror will be
scared of India.”
In his earlier years, Modi joins an Indian right-wing Hindu nationalist paramilitary
volunteer organization. He goes through vigorous training to learn to fight for India. During his
training at the organization, the character of Modi delivers dialogues that expresses his
dedication to India. At one occasion, he says, “The people who love the country, do not love
anything else.” Modi also has the following conversation with his mentor at the organization:
Modi to his mentor: I have devoted my life to India.
Modi’s mentor: You will have to lose sleep if you want to train.
Modi: I have so many dreams for my country in my eyes that I do not have any space for
sleep.
Just like the film Raazi, PM Narendra Modi is also packed with nationalistic songs. One
of the songs in the film contains the following phrases:
My country is asking me when I will pay its debt
My sky is asking me when I will perform the righteous behaviour
I have promised mother India that I will not let it bow
I swear to this soil that I will not let this country disappear
Not let this country disappear, not let this country bow
In the song, sacrificing oneself for one’s country is indicated as the “righteous
behaviour”. The song reminds that the people of India hold responsibility towards it, and this
responsibility includes that they should bring prosperity to the country, not allow it to bow down
to anyone, and not let the country disappear from the world. Another song of the film named
“Hindustani” continues to set the Indians apart from the rest of the world and give out the
message that Indians are the best. The song contains the following lyrics:
Everyone recognizes us from the name of India
We walk with pride on these streets
Someone who will try to break us will bear the consequences
We have dreams in our eyes, and we salute the flag
This is a new India, but our ideology is the same old
Listen clearly, the people of this world, do not look at us with evil eye
No matter how much you try, Indians are leading everyone, repeat this after us
We are stubborn, we are used to of winning, we carry love
We will win every star of the sky, we will win the whole universe
India is standing with pride, Vande Matarm! (I bow to the mother India)
Through the plot, dialogues, and songs, the film PM Narendra Modi presents overtly pro-
nationalistic themes.
Sacrifice
Sacrifice for the sake of nation is also a heavily discussed sub-theme in two out of the
three analyzed films.
Raazi. In the film Raazi, the character of Hidayat is revealed to be an Indian spy in
Pakistan. In one of the scenes, when Hidayat returns to Kashmir after his meeting with the
Pakistani army officer, he has the following conversation with an Indian Intelligence Agency
officer, Mir:
Mir: I do not know what to say, Hidayat. I cannot fathom what you have just said. Spying
for India – and maintaining contacts in Pakistan is one thing. But an innocent girl, who
knows nothing about spying – she is your daughter, Hidayat.
Hidayat: She is an Indian first. You do not know how crucial this time is for India. And
how dangerous it can get. They have got a whiff of India's involvement in Bengal, and
they will not tolerate it. They will never let Pakistan break apart. They are hatching a big
scheme against us.
Mir: What kind of scheme?
Hidayat: Mir Sahab (Sir), if I knew that would I risk my daughter's life? They have a lot
of faith in me which they can only have in my daughter after me.
The notion of sacrifice for one’s nation is brought up here. The film introduces Hidayat
as a patriot who is willing to put his daughter’s life in danger for his country, highlighting the
notions of sacrifice and nationalism.
PM Narendra Modi. The notion of self-sacrifice is also a major theme in the film PM
Narendra Modi. Modi is portrayed as someone who, throughout his life, loves his country the
most, and nothing comes before his country. In the film, when Modi is campaigning for his
candidacy for the Prime Minister of India, he receives reports that some terrorists have entered
the city of his next rally, and they intend to kill him. Modi decides to go on with his rally despite
the threats “for the sake of his nation”. He has the following conversation with two of his
advisors:
Advisor 1: This is not a media’s false report or a political tactic, it is confirmed.
Advisor 2: Terrorists have entered Patna to specifically target you.
Advisor 1: You will have to cancel this rally.
Modi: Media will get a breaking news, and my opponents will get a point that Modi ran
away. I do not care about them, but every Indian who is looking at me with hope will be
disappointed. How can a person who thinks about his safety first can protect the country?
The film is portraying nationalism as an honor, and it is showing that a person who cares
for the county more than their life is the person who should be in charge. Similarly, just like
Hidayat in the film Raazi, Modi’s mother is also taking honour in putting her son in a dangerous
situation for the good of the country. Modi’s advisor calls his mother and asks her to talk Modi
out of going to the rally and putting himself in danger. When Modi talks to his mother on phone,
she tears up:
Modi: Maa (mother), you are crying?
Modi’s mother: No, a fighter’s mother does not hold tears in her eyes. She holds pride. I
am proud of you. Jai hind.
Modi: Jai hind, Maa!
Modi to his advisors: I will be in Patna (city in India) tomorrow evening at 7 p.m., if I
want to change the destiny of this country, first I must face my destiny.
This, once again, is a very nationalistic conversation. Modi’s mother is proud to send his
son into danger for the sake of her country. When Modi goes to address his political rally, he
finds that a lot of people are attending his speech. He addresses the rally:
Modi: You all came here despite such a big threat. This is a message for our enemies that
India is more important to us than our own lives. For me, India is my only family. If one
and a quarter billion Indians take steps together, then India will move forward one and a
quarter billion step forward.
When Modi goes to address the people in the rally, he is depicted as a brave man who is
deeply in love with India, and who would do anything for his country. The many Indians who
show up to listen to his address are also shown as the noble Indians who care about their country
more than their lives, since they are attending the rally despite being aware of the threats.
Nation Before Everything
The first two films, Raazi and PM Narender Modi, bring up the notion of “Nation before
everything” multiples times.
Raazi. In Raazi, Hidayat brings up his daughters identity as an “Indian” and says that
being an Indian comes before everything else.
One of the conversations goes as following:
Mir: And did you ask Sehmat?
Hidayat: Did my father ask me? He simply informed me and taught me.
Mir: Have you told your daughter about the future you are planning for her?
Hidayat: I will – I will tell her, and you will teach her. If you give her a chance, you will
see for yourself. What I cannot accomplish, Sehmat will!
The film depicts that for patriots like Hidayat, duties towards one’s nation are a priority
and come before everything else, even one’s family. The notion of “India first” is seeped into
generations. Hidayat’s father put him on the line of duty for his country without seeking his say,
and Hidayat is willing to do the same to his daughter.
When Hidayat’s daughter Sehmat arrives in Kashmir, the following conversation occurs
at Hidayat’s home between him, his wife (Teji), and Sehmat:
Hidayat: During my last trip to the other side, I became aware of a grave threat to India.
Sehmat: War? Again?
Hidayat: The winds of war are blowing in Bengal. And in order to prevent India from
interfering, Pakistan wants to do something that will cripple India.
Sehmat: What can they do?
Hidayat: I do not know. This entire situation is a matter of a few months, and I do not
have a few months left –
Sehmat: Mother –
Teji: He told me last night – what he has known for four months. There is a tumor in his
lung, and it is growing.
Sehmat: Why did you not tell me, Abbu (father)? I would have come sooner.
Hidayat: That is why I have called you now.
Teji: No – that is not why you have called her.
Hidayat: We need to be prepared for any emergency – I want you to take my place. I
want you to be the eyes and ears for India and live in Pakistan.
Sehmat: How?
Teji: Tell her that, too.
Hidayat: I am telling her, Teji. I am telling her everything –
The idea of India-first appears again in this conversation. Sehmat just found out that her
father is going to die soon due to cancer; however, the focus of the conversation remains on India
and its safety. This repeats the idea that “nation comes first,” as seen earlier in the film.
While Hidayat explains his plan to Sehmat, he makes sure that he is stressing the
importance of this task to her, using phrases such as that he wants Sehmat to be the “eyes and
ears for India.” The notions of self-sacrifice and India-first have been established earlier in film
through conversations. Now, playing a major role for the country through putting one’s life on
the line of duty sounds noble and honorable.
Hidayat informs Sehmat about his plan to marry her to Syed’s son and to spy on his
family. Later that night, he gets cold feet and goes to Sehmat’s room:
Hidayat: I want you to go back to college tomorrow, dear. I do not know what I was
thinking. How could I even think about putting you in such grave danger?
Sehmat: Why do you risk your own life for the country, Abbu?
Hidayat: That is my father's legacy. I did – as I was told. But to make you do the same –
is a mistake.
Sehmat: So alright, Abbu. I will go back to college, as you say. But my father, too, has
raised me with the same belief—that nothing comes before the country, not even
yourself. And if that is a mistake then enrolling your sons in the army to protect the
nation is also a mistake.
Nationalism is deeply rooted in the family of Hidayat. His father taught him that his
country comes first, and he raised his daughter with the same set of belief. Hidayat is a family-
oriented man who loves his daughter a lot; however, country still comes first for him, and his
daughter has learned to do the same from him. This dialogue, said in a very emotional tone,
refers to the idea of India-first again.
It is interesting to note that Hidayat’s character is a Kashmiri Muslim, and he lives in
Jammu and Kashmir with his family. Jammu and Kashmir is a region that was administered by
the Indian government from 1954 to 2019 and was dissolved in 2019 by Indian government into
its own union territory (Reagan, 2019). By presenting a Kashmiri family as extremely loyal to
India, the film is reinforcing the image of Kashmiris as people who have been Indian from within
all along, and that the loyalties of Kashmiri people lies with the Indian government.
The storyline proceeds and Sehmat rigorously trains with Mir and learns the tactics
required for spying. Near the end of the training, the following conversation occurs between
Sehmat and Mir:
Mir: Can I ask you a question? Why did you agree to do this? You were studying in
college. You must have had some plans for your future. Dreams of your own
Sehmat: My father and his father fought in our freedom struggle – I asked him once –
why did you take those beatings? Spent all those months in jail? He replied with a smile –
there is no ‘me’ before the nation.
“No ‘me’ before the notion” is the clear indication of the idea of India-first in the film.
The film represents that the dreams and plans for one’s future can be set aside for one’s nation,
since it comes first. A very strong nationalistic theme can be seen later in the film as well. While
spying for India, Sehmat starts to teach a singing class in the military school of Pakistan. The
song that she teaches continues to play in the background for a major part of the film. The lyrics
of the song are:
My country, my motherland, forever may you bloom
Wherever in the world I roam, you will always remain home
You are my purpose, my very being is you
Wherever I may reach, my reason remains you
I will meet each peril before it touches you
My life at stake forever, always to protect you
From the heart to my lips, my wish rises like a prayer
Like your eternal flame, oh Lord! May my life spread light forever
Nationalism is a major theme in this song. One’s country is referred as a home that will
always remain home regardless where one might be. Moreover, country is referred as a reason
for one’s being, and the message of sacrifice for one’s country or the notion of “India first” is
apparent in the song by statements such as, “I will meet each peril before it touches you.” The
song itself is very emotional and serves as a backdrop during the scenes where Sehmat performs
dangerous spy work. The film is narrating the story of a brave Indian here, who is putting her life
in danger for her country, and she is willing to do it because that is her purpose: to serve her
country.
The presentation of the notion of “nation comes first” can be seen again in the film when
Sehmat’s husband Iqbal discovers that she is a spy and says that he will have to turn her to the
security forces of Pakistan:
Iqbal: But the supreme truth here is that nothing is more important to me, than my
country. I love you, Sehmat – But love can never come before the country.
The notion that one’s country comes before everything else is repeated here. However,
this time the dialogue is not being said by an Indian about India, but a Pakistani about his
country. This further implies that one’s country is a huge part of one’s identity, and the decisions
that a person makes are based primarily on that identity. This can be again seen in the film when
Syed receives news that his daughter-in-law and friend were Indian spies, as he says, “He was
my friend. But how could I forget that he was an Indian after all. It is all my fault.”
When the Indian forces fail to safely rescue Sehmat from Pakistan, Mir decides to kill her
along with her husband. As he orders to bomb her, he says, “Nothing before the Nation.”
Repeating the India-first theme again. Sehmat escapes the attack and later goes to Mir’s hiding
place to confront him:
Sehmat: Killing Iqbal was never part of the plan. Why? Why did you kill him? What
loyalty do you preach and practice? You even gave orders to kill me!
Mir: That decision was yours. Only you will bear the consequences.
Sehmat: I sacrificed my conscience – my life, for you! And you did not even hesitate to
take my life.
Mir: That is the nature of war, Sehmat. Innocent lives are lost in collateral damage. But
during war, except for the war, nothing else matters. No one matters. Not you. Not me.
No one.
Even though, throughout the film, the themes of nationalism, self-sacrifice, and “India
first” are apparent, one of the final dialogues says that sacrificing life for the country is an
individual’s decision, and they shall bear the consequence as well. No matter what drives the
war, it is brutal and has cruel aftermath.
The final scene of the movie shows old Sehmat sitting in a small house in the middle of
nowhere. As the following song lyrics are played in the background:
I may not remain, not even in memory
But in safe hands, you will always be.
My country, my motherland – !
The notion of self-sacrifice for country is being brought up. The person who sacrifices for
the country does not seek validation, appreciation, or anything in return. This brings back the
notion of nationalism. The film shows Sehmat ending up alone and not wanting to do anything
with the outside world due to the emotional burden of war. However, the final verses of the song
that is played in the film attempt to justify the consequences of war, as nothing else matter as
long as the country remains protected. Most of the film gives out a nationalistic message that
nothing comes before the nation; Nevertheless, the final scene leaves the depiction of
nationalism somewhat ambivalent and neither completely pro or anti-nationalistic.
PM Narendra Modi. Many scenes in the film PM Narendra Modi indicate that “nation
comes first” for the character of Modi. As mentioned above, Modi continues to hold his address
to the public despite the threats, giving the message that his own life matters nothing as
compared to the nation, hence the idea that for him nation comes first.
Gully Boy. The film Gully Boy takes a different approach towards Nationalism as
compared to the rest of the two films. One of the most popular song of the film is called
“Jingostaan”, which is a combination between the word Jingoism and Hindustan (India).
Jingoism refers to extreme form of nationalism, specifically in a form of aggressive foreign
policy (Soanes, 2006). The song attempts to mock the aggression that is held in the name of
patriotism. The lyrics of the song are:
Grab them, rip them, cut them, flog them
I want to see deep welts on their skin
Slowly they will confess
Sink the ground beneath their feet
It's 2018, the nation is in danger
Engulfed in flames, shout them down, scare them all
Play your poisonous flute, Enchant them all
Make them surrender or bleed them dry
Long live Jingostaan! Jingostaan! Jingostaan!
Through these lyrics, the film highlights the thinking that can be harvested due to the
presence of extreme nationalism. This extreme form of nationalism can lead towards Jingoism,
which causes the creation of hostile foreign policy by a nation. The phrases, “Grab them, rip
them, cut them, flog them,” I want to see deep welts on their skin,” and “Sink the ground
beneath their feet” portray how sentiments of protecting the nation can go far and end up turning
into violent acts. The phrase “It’s 2018, the nation is in danger” refers to the political situation of
the region in 2018, when a few right-wing Indian journalists and politicians were found to be
advocating for the war between India and Pakistan in the name of protecting the nation. The song
continues to call India as “Jingostaan”; the word “staan” in Hindi means land. Jingostaan here is
referring to the land of “Jingos.” Through this song, the film is criticizing war and unnecessary
hatred. Through this song, the film is depicting anti-nationalistic and anti-violence/war message.
Religion
The theme of Religion is also prominent in all three films.
Raazi
All the main characters in the film Raazi are Muslim, whether Indian, Pakistani, or
Kashmiri. The protagonist Sehmat is a Kashmiri Muslim girl who identifies as an Indian. Sehmat
uses the word Allah (God) in the conversation many times, signifying that religion and God are a
part of her identity. The first dialogue that the character of Sehmat say to her father is: “Thanks
to Allah.” The main song that is played through a crucial part of the film “My motherland”
include the lines that praise God, and prayers to Him are repeated throughout it, forming the
connection between love for country and love for God. Through showing a Muslim family who
identifies as Indian and is very nationalist, the film is highlighting that the loyalty of Indian
Muslims and Kashmiri Muslims lie with India. Religion is important to the family of Sehmat, but
nothing can surpass their love for their motherland India.
PM Narendra Modi
Religion is central to the identity of the character of Modi in the film PM Narendra Modi.
Modi is mostly shown with a tilak on his forehead which is a religious mark worn by people who
follow Hinduism. In his younger age, he embarks on the journey to the mountain of Himalayas to
become a Sanyasi (Hindu religious mendicant). During this time, a song with the following lyrics
is played in the film:
My mystic mind cannot find rest, it has been wandering for days and nights
These eyes are tired due to looking for their purpose in all directions
Happiness and sadness are now alien, I cannot get sorrowful for anyone now
My mind is in the position, where everything seems like a lie
My mystic mind cannot find rest, my mystic mind cannot find rest
This song is played in the film when Modi is on a journey to find god, and it stresses that
finding god is the purpose of humans and that without god, a person’s life is purposeless.
Religion is such an eminent part of the film that many of the film posters contains images of the
lead character Modi bowing in temple and praying to the Murti (sculpture) of Hindu gods.
Throughout the film, Modi is shown as a devout follower of Hindu religion, however his
followers belong from different religions. On the other hand, liberal media are portrayed as evil
and anti-Modi. In one scene, Modi is giving interview to a journalist:
Journalist to Modi: Our India is a secular country, and people are afraid that you will turn
our Hindustan (India) to Hindu-das (Hinduism devoted).
Modi: Do you understand the meaning of Hindustan? Because Hinduism is not just a
religion, it is an ideology. Hinduism is the only reason that this country is secular.
Because a Pandit (Hindu scholar) who prays to a sculpture is a Hindu for us, and
someone who does not believe in the worship of a sculpture is also a Hindu for us. Not
from religion, from culture. Only India is such a country, where people perform Namaz
(Muslim prayer) on roads, and Ganpati’s (Hindu god) rally is also found on the road. Big
secular countries such as France and Switzerland have banned hijab, but not in India.
Pakistan’s prime minister can only be a Muslim, but in India Abdul Kalam sahib (A
Muslim man) remained to be the Prime Minister. This is what Hindustan is. Where there
is only one thing that is bigger than religion, and it is country.
In the above dialogue, Modi’s character initially praises the Hinduism religion for its
inclusivity. He later praises the religious policies of India by comparing them to the policies of
other countries, such as France, Switzerland, and Pakistan. Through this dialogue the film
promotes the good aspects of Hindu religion, but more importantly it highlights the importance
of association with one’s country. In the last line, Modi says that country is bigger than religion,
and this theme recurs throughout the film. Religion is an important part of Modi’s character;
however, just as with Sehmat’s character in the film Raazi, nothing can surpass the love for his
motherland. The theme that religion is important, but not as important as the country, reappears
through more songs in the film. One of the songs contain the following lyrics:
Indian comes before Hindus and Muslims
We will put on the lamps for Diwali (Hindu festival)
And eat Sawanyan (dessert) on Eid (Muslim fetstival)
Santa also comes here to grants gifts
This soil is my life, this soil is my Geeta (reference to Bhagavad Gita, a holy book in
Hinduism)
This soil is my Ramadan (holy month for Muslims), I will not allow it to be erased
This is my Khuda (Muslim god), this is my Ram (Hindu god), this is my India.
Another song of the film called Junoon contains similar message that the religious
differences are small compared to the affiliation with one’s country. The song states that love for
the country should be one’s religion:
He is god, He is prophet, He is Ram
What kind of war is on his name?
All the colours for all religions are together on my (Indian) flag
How are the colours for two nations (Hindu and Muslims) different?
What has passed is in the past, there should not be a wall of religion anymore
We should not let any symbol of hatred to survive
We make the country, we are the country
Gully Boy
Religious beliefs also play an important role in the film Gully Boy. The protagonist
Murad is a Muslim character who comes from an Islam practicing family. His girlfriend and her
family are also Muslims. The character of Murad wears a Taweez (amulet worn by some
Muslims) throughout the film. He goes to the mosque and prays with his father. During two
occasions in the film, Murad is offered alcohol to drink:
Murad: No, thanks.
Person: You do not drink? Want something else?
Murad: No
In another scene, Murad sits in a bar with his friend. His friend orders alcohol but when
the server asks Murad his order, his friend says no for him:
Murad’s friend: One beer.
Server to Murad: And you?
Murad’s friend: He doesn't drink.
Alcohol is prohibited in Islam. By portraying Murad as someone who does not engage in
drinking alcohol, the film presents the message that religion is important to Murad. Even in the
rap songs that Murad writes and sings, reference to his association to god are evident:
I ask no one for help, I only bow my head before god
I plead to be forgiven, just let it flow, let your truth show
Murad’s parents also engage in religious practices. Both his parents wear taweez, and his
grandmother covers her head. Murad’s father is a part of a polygamous marriage. Polygamous
marriages are only performed by Muslim population of India, since it is forbidden in Hinduism.
Murad’s family also believes in superstitions and believes that things happen due to supernatural
forces. When Murad’s father starts following his new wife’s orders, his grandmother says: “He's
taking the TV inside, too. She has put a black magic spell on him.” Similarly, when Murad’s
girlfriend gets into a fight with another girl, he jokingly says to her, “You are possessed with a
spirit. I will have to get you exorcised.” In one scene, when Murad is recording his rap song on
an I-Pad, his mother assumes that he is talking to himself and says, “Hey Murad, you should not
talk to yourself, it is bad luck.” Murad’s father also says phrases such as, “The rest is up to God.”
Even though Murad is portrayed as a character who follows religion, the film also
discusses the misuse of religion. The film gives the message throughout that, even though he
practices religion, Murad still has the ability to question its integrity when necessary. In one of
his rap songs, Murad says:
Religion is used for money; so, think, listen, speak up
Stop turning a blind eye, try some virtue
Honesty will not hurt you, clean this dirt!
In another rap song Murad says, “Art is my religion, and I have no other prayer to fake.”
The film is portraying Murad as a young progressive Muslim who pursues a career in hip-hop
music, which is refreshing. However, the film seems to be repeating many of the existing
stereotypes about the Muslims in India, such as that they engage in polygamous marriages, they
believe in black magic, or the women are extremely oppressed. Murad is a good student, and he
has good morals. Once, he calls out his friend who is using young children to sell drugs, “Moeen,
you are using those kids to deal drugs? Shame on you, Moeen.” Despite this, he himself commits
crime and steals cars when he needs money. The film Gully Boy sustains an overall anti-
nationalistic theme; Nevertheless, unlike the rest of the films, religion is not distinctly linked to
nationalism in the film.
Othering
The notion of Other is depicted in all three films.
Raazi
The film Raazi presents Bangladeshis as others. In the film, a Pakistani army officer
refers to the freedom movement of East Pakistan as solely Mujib-ur-Rahman’s “dreams of
liberation.” The notion of Other is apparent here. Despite the fact that at this time East Pakistan
is the part of the country, the people belonging to the region are being seen as Others. Through
this scene, the film is justifying the East and West Pakistan partition, since the people of East
Pakistan were seen as Other by the people of West Pakistan, and they were not meant to exist
together anyway.
The notion of Othering can be seen again in the film when Sehmat gets married and
moves to Pakistan. She is warmly welcomed by everyone except the oldest servant of the family,
who is cold towards her. Sehmat attempts to help the servant in the kitchen with breakfast. The
servant refuses her help and asks her not to interfere with the household routine. Sehmat
discusses the servant’s hostile behavior with her sister-in-law Munira:
Sehmat: When you first came, was he like this with you too?
Munira: Somewhat.
Sehmat: But maybe because I am Indian? Is that why?
Munira: Could be
The notion of Other can be found in this scene as well. When in Pakistan, Sehmat is
being viewed as an outsider despite moving to Pakistan for the rest of her life by the servant. The
film portrays the message that one’s national identity is the most integral part of their identity
and it separates them from others.
Gully Boy
The film focuses on people’s identity on the basis of their religion. Murad, the
protagonist, belongs from a Muslim family and is seen as Other by some Hindu. An example of
this is when Murad visits his Hindu friend, and his friend’s father asks him, “Murad, where are
you from? Some Muslim ghetto?” Through such incidents the film highlights the discrimination
that religious minorities can face in their own country. Another example is when Murad’s father
finds him a job and asks him to take the job, as “they (employers) are good people, It's tough
time for Muslims anyway.”
PM Narendra Modi
The film PM Narendra Modi contains a lot conflict between the Hindu and Muslim
community of India. Moreover, Pakistan and its people are portrayed frequently as Others.
Pakistan is portrayed as a country that is planting terrorists in India as a result of the political and
social differences between the two countries. At various occasions the character of Modi calls
out Pakistan and tells Pakistan that India is better than Pakistan:
Modi: Today, we are not worried, but those should be worried who could not win from us
in the battle zone or cricket ground. That is why they came to fix the match of this
election. But, all of you defeated them by coming here.
Class Hegemony
Class hegemony is the grouping based on power, wealth, and the privilege of social
classes in a manner that the elite social class holds the power to exploit the individuals belonging
from socially-ranked lower class (Russo & Bryan, 2013).
PM Narendra Modi
When it comes to social class hegemony, the film PM Narendra Modi points to its
existence in the roots of India and challenges it. The main character Modi is basically a tea-seller
who ends up taking oath as the 14
th
Prime Minister of India. By doing so, he is challenging the
existing class hegemony that exists in India. When Modi decides to run for the position of the
Prime Minister of India, his opponents mock him for his poor background as his credentials as a
former chaiwala (tea-seller). To this, Modi responds:
Modi: They say that a chaiwala cannot become a Prime Minister of a country. Yes, I am
a chaiwala. I sold tea; I did not sell the country like them. Every youngster can become
the Prime Minister of this country. Every person who sweeps can become the Prime
Minister of this country. Every farmer can become the PM of this country. India has
changed, Sir. Now the credentials of your father would not do you any good, only your
work would.
The film portrays the existing the class hegemony in India in a negative light. The
portrayal suggests that it is possible to break the hegemony that exists in India, and anyone who
breaks this hegemony is a brave and noble person. India is turning into a country that provides
everyone a chance on the basis of their talent despite their family background, social standing,
and financial standing. When Modi finally gets into power, he makes the ministers of his
cabinets serve tea to the servants of their office, further smashing the hegemonic system of the
country.
Modi: I am asking you to serve, not get served.
Gully Boy
Many references to the presence of class hegemony in the Indian society are made in the
film Gully Boy; however, almost all of them are a criticism towards those who hold power.
Murad, the protagonist of the film belongs to a very poor family and lives in a very poor
neighborhood. His neighborhood is so poor that tour guides take tourists through their paces to
show how poor people in India live:
Tour guide: You can take pictures. And this is the toilet. This is for the whole
community.
Tourist: How many people are in the community?
Tour guide: Lots! The other one is being built over there. Come, I'll show you.
The Tourist, while visiting Murad’s house:
Tourist: Crazy, isn't it? Every inch is being used. It's incredible. How many people live
here?
Tour guide: I have no idea.
Tourist: So small!
Class hegemony is apparent in the scenes, some people are so poor that they have become
the reason for the amusement for another social group. The film highlights the social divide
between higher and lower income groups. Murad, who aspires to become a famous rapper, writes
about the sad reality of his life:
Why is every eye moist in this shantytown?
Days turn to poison once the sun goes down
Restless and troubled are those who live here
In this bottomless well where they'll drown
Here, the film provides a channel of expression to the people whose voices are not heard
by the people in power. The people who spend their life in extreme poverty often end up dying in
these circumstances. The film is shedding light on the less privileged people and their struggles.
In one scene, Murad’s mother says to his father, “I have big dreams for him (Murad),” and his
father responds, “Dreams? Who do you think you are? Look around. Make sure your big dreams
match your reality.”
The film further deals with class hegemony, through discussing how deep roots of class
hegemony in the society prevent people from growing out of their social class system despite
having the skill and talent. Murad works as a driver for a rich woman. As Murad drives the
woman, her husband, and her daughter around town, the husband has the following conversation
with his daughter who does not want to go to graduate school, and Murad:
Husband: How educated are you?
Murad: I am in my final year of graduation, sir.
Husband to his daughter: Did you hear that? Everyone's a graduate today. And you want
to be on the same level as he is?
Murad is remined of his social class and his destiny being tied to it in another scene
where he has a conversation with his uncle. When Murad starts working for his uncle to support
his mother and little brother, he decides to also audition for a rapping contest. He approaches his
uncle to ask for a day off to participate in the initial audition:
Murad: I have some work tomorrow. I need to go somewhere. Can I have the day off?
Uncle: Where are you going on a picnic?
Murad: There's a contest I'm taking part in. It's the first audition.
Uncle: Where did you learn such fancy words? Your father is a driver, remember? A
servant's son is a servant. It's the law of nature.
However, through the complete storyline, the film criticizes the class hegemony in the
country and gives a message that it is possible to break this divide between rich and poor. The
final conversation between Murad and his father goes as following:
Aftab: Call Ateeq and apologize (for leaving work)
Murad: I will not call him. He called us servants.
Aftab: But we are servants.
Murad: That means we serve and work hard. We aren't slaves. Whatever we are, we
deserve respect.
The Social class difference is also pointed out through the lyrics of the rap songs in the
film:
I cannot reach out to you, I cannot wipe your tears
My standing won't let me,
You are near, Yet we're a world apart
Why are my hands tied? Can anyone tell me
Why this divide, this disparity?
Who pulls the strings? Who writes the story?
Who writes the story?
The film also focuses on the power of expression to break the class hegemony in India.
References to the power of expression are made in various scenes of the film. The lyrics of the
song that are played multiple times during the film are:
The lava of my words will melt my shackles
You will reap as you shall sow
My dreams will make fear tremble
You can't bury dreams six-feet-under
No fear, only guts!
We will storm ahead, we will seize the day
Blood and sweat gave our life meaning
Why? because our time will come!
You were born naked; you will take nothing with you
Patriarchy
Patriarchy and its impact is present in all three films.
Raazi
When Hidayat first asks his daughter to spy in Pakistan, Sehmat’s mother Teji hints her
distress towards sending her daughter away by asking her husband to come clear about his
motives. However, this does not seem to bother either Hidayat or Sehmat. This reflects on the
hegemony rooted in the family system in the subcontinent. Mothers, despite playing a major role
in raising children, are often left out of making important life decisions for children by the head
of the families.
The film presents Hidayat’s household as a very typical sub-continental household where
a man is the head of the family and has the ability to make decisions for the women. He is not
worried about the consequences of making a major decision on the behalf of his daughter
because his country is in a crucial situation and needs her. However, the film seems to go beyond
the gender roles in the society of sub-continent, as Sehmat, who is a girl, is being sent to spy and
train with male colleagues.
PM Narendra Modi
The film PM Narendra Modi presents the character of Indira Gandhi (the only female
Prime Minister of India) as determined political leader. However, almost every other female
character in the film is portrayed as helpless. Modi’s mother plays a huge role in his personality
building. Modi highly respects his mother, deeply cares about her, and does not take any step
without her approval. This portrays the role of Indian women in the Indian society and towards
raising their children. As an adult Modi builds a well for the women of a village who do not have
access to water. While building a well, Modi says, “Until the women of India are helpless, this
country can never become strong.”
This is shown as an act of empowering women. However, in a broader sense, this just
reinforces the existing ideology of Bollywood that women require strong men to rescue them and
empower them.
Gully Boy
The theme of patriarchy appears throughout the Gully Boy. In the beginning of film, the
protagonist Murad’s father Aftab remarries and brings his second, much-younger wife home. His
first wife, Murad’s mother Razia, performs all the chores for her husband’s second wife as her
husband asks her. Murad shows distress about the situation to his uncle, Razia’s brother Ateeq:
Murad: Maa is very unhappy, uncle.
Uncle: There is nothing I can do.
Murad: She is your sister…
Uncle: And he is her husband.
Through this scene, the film provides a glimpse of the patriarchy that exists in the Indian
society in a negative light, where a woman’s destiny is held in the hand of the men in her life.
Razia silently suffers as her husband lives a happy life with his new wife. One day Razia and
Aftab gets into an argument over Murad’s singing and it gets directed toward Aftab’s second
marriage:
Razia: Did you ask me before remarrying? Now fix it.
Aftab: Tell Murad not to strut about.
Razia: Brilliant solution!
Aftab: If you're leaving it up to me, pack your bags and get out!
Razia: You want me to leave? I should go?
Aftab: Stop! I am being polite.
Razia: Polite? You brought another woman to my bed.
Aftab: Yes, I did! You weren't of much use on that bed anyway!
The film is depicting patriarchy in a negative light by showcasing the entitled thinking of
a man in the Indian society, specifically in a Muslim household. Being the head of the family, the
man has the power to force the women out of the house. Moreover, the primary purpose of a
woman is to please a man, and, if she fails to do it, she is useless. The film showcases the
injustices in the Indian society on the basis of gender.
Aftab has an abusive relationship with Razia. It becomes very prominent when he starts
to beat her whenever she becomes vocal:
Aftab: Ungrateful wretch!
Razia: Beat me! I won't keep quiet now! Go ahead, slap me!
Although Murad is always very respectful to his father. He physically jumps in once his
father beats his mother in front of him
Murad: Abu! Don't you dare hit her! I'll call the police--don't hit her! The police will
straighten you out. Don't touch her.
This is a classic example of good versus bad man. A bad man hits woman, and a good
man protects her. As refreshing as it sounds during the grim scene of injustice, this scene still
gives the message that an Indian woman needs a male to save her. Razia could have threatened to
call the police herself, but her son had to jump in and save her. Despite being a woman herself,
Murad’s grandmother finds Murad’s behavior toward his father to be rude and blames Razia for
it:
Murad’s grandmother: Is this how you've raised him? No wonder your husband brought
home a new wife. Is this what you've taught him?
This is the presentation of the pressure on women to be a good mother and to raise
obedient children. And any woman who fails to do her job deserves to be replaced. This harsh
face of society again becomes apparent in the film when Razia leaves her husband and asks her
brother for help:
Razia’s brother: You want to leave your husband and want me to help you?
Patriarchy is also portrayed in the film Gully Boy through the storyline of Murad’s
girlfriend Safeena. Safeena gets into a fight with another girl, Albina. As a result, the parents of
both girls are called by their teachers. The following conversion occurs:
Safeena: You can check her phone, Uncle.
Albina: How can you check—
Albina’s father: Shut up!
Albina’s father forcefully grabs her phone from her hand and checks it and slaps her. This
shows how keeping an eye on the doings of one’s daughter is normal. In fact, parents take pride
in keeping a close eye on their daughter, as later in the scene, when Albina tells Safeena’s
parents that Safeena is having an “affair (relationship with Murad), Safeena gets away by
saying:
Safeena: Wouldn't you know if I was having an affair right under your nose?
In another scene, a female singer is shown to be performing in at a college campus.
Despite being a good singer, she is booed by some boys in the front of the crowd and she leaves
the stage. A male singer walks up to the stage and has the following conversation with the boys:
Boys: Get this girl out of here!
Male singer: What happened? Those guys were saying something over there. What's
going on, guys? Couldn't handle Juhi's talent? Who found the song boring?
Boys: The girl was boring!
Male singer: There you are. And if you don't like her, she should shut up, right?
Boys: Well said!
Male singer: Come, I'll perform for you.
The male singer continues to perform a rap song for the audience, mainly gesturing
towards the boys as he recites the following lines:
A snake for women, a blemish on mankind
My words have more heat than you
Shame on you! you have no future
You have no strength, Use your head
The wave of truth has flooded the town
Stop throwing your weight around
Watch your step, be true to yourself
Kill your arrogance, end this empty existence
End this hustling, and random muscling
Cool that fever, end this bragging, End this hustling
The male singer calls out the boys on their harmful masculinity and the film puts forward
a good message towards women’s empowerment. However, the issue remains the same in this
scene as well: A woman needs a man to speak for herself.
Safeena studies in the medical college and aspires to be a surgeon; however, her mother
repeatedly tries to find her a groom and marry her. Safeena’s mother shows her photos of
potential matches for marriages:
Safeena: I'm studying.
Mother: You're lucky you get to choose. Nobody even asked us. I was told who to marry
and that was that.
This demonstrates how little say young women have even regarding their personal
matters. Moreover, the film is highlighting that until this day, for most Indians, education is not
the most achievement for women, marriage is. Despite this, Safeena is shown as a strong
character who is deeply in love with Murad but dreams about building a good future for herself.
This can be seen when Murad asks her what she wants to achieve in life:
Safeena: My own medical practice and marriage with you.
Murad: Oh, so I come second?
Safeena: When life gives you something good, shut up and take it.
Safeena’s parents are conservative Muslims, who do not allow her to go outside other
than for work and study. Safeena often sneaks out to meet her boyfriend, Murad, and male
friends. Once, Safeena gets into a fight and her parents find out that she has been sneaking out
behind their back:
Safeena’s mother: Is this what we've taught you? Then why did you do this?
Safeena: If I tell you the truth, you will never let me leave the house.
Safeena’s mother: So, is this our fault, too?
Safeena: I didn't say that. But, did I have a choice?
Safeena’s mother: If you don't lie and fight, would your life be ruined?
Safeena: It's already ruined, Ma. My life is confined to college, the clinic, and home.
What else do I do? So, what more do you want to do? I want to go out. Party with my
friends, watch movies, go to concerts, wear lipstick. Talk to boys. Not secretly but in
your presence. I want to invite them home like people do normally.
Safeena’s heartfelt dialogues seemed to have no effect on her mother, who starts to beat her and
grounds her.
Despite Safeena’s request, her parents continue to look for a groom for her. They also
refuse to let her go back to college. She asks her parents when she can go back to college:
Safeena’s mother: Get married first.
Safeena: Dad? Dad. It's just 18 months to go. This is a crucial year. I can't miss a single
lecture.
Safeena’s mother: There's no need for that, Safeena.
Safeena: Dad? Say something. You know I'm a brilliant student. You can't pull me out of
college. I've apologized. Everyone is talking. Dad, please! Please! Dad, please. Let me
study. Please, Dad. I want to study, Dad. I'll marry anyone you want. Please. Please.
Safeena’s dad: I'll drop you at college myself and pick you up every day. But you'll have
to meet suitors.
Safeena: Yes
Safeena also supports the idea of Murad becoming rapper and expresses that she will look
after both of them financially, when she says, “You do whatever you like. I am going to be a
surgeon; we will have a good life.This is an example where the film portrays a strong headed,
independent female character who is achieving of things on her own. The film also contains
another strong female character, Sky. Sky is a music student who is interested in working with
hip-hop music. Murad agrees to work with Sky thinking that it is a man, but is shocked to find
that she is a girl when they first meet:
Sky: Sorry, I am a girl.
Murad: Makes no difference to us, girl or boy.
Conclusion
The analyzed data were categorized into themes: Nationalism, religion, othering,
patriarchy, and class hegemony. First, the description and of relevant scenes was provided, and
then the scenes were analyzed through the lens of the themes. Nationalism appeared as the most
recurring theme. Religion and patriarchy were also common themes among the three analyzed
films; however, religion and patriarchy kept rotating back to nationalism in the film.
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION
This study analyses the portrayal of nationalism and religious identity in Bollywood
films. Three Bollywood films named Raazi, PM Narendra Modi, and Gully Boy are analyzed for
the purpose of this study. The previous chapter provided the description of the relevant scenes
along with the analysis. As a result, nationalism, religious identity, and patriarchy appeared as
the most prevalent themes in all three films. This chapter further compares these themes with the
existing literature, draw implications based on the findings, and discusses limitations of this
study.
Research Questions
The two research questions of this study explored the representation of nationalism and
religious identity in Bollywood films during the reign of PM Modi.
Religious Identity
The most common aspect between the main characters of the films is their association
with their religions. Religion plays a major role in the identity building of Sehmat, Modi, and
Murad. The characters of Sehmat and Murad practice Islam, they use the word “Allah” in many
of their everyday conversations. Both, the families of Sehmat and Murad follows Islam that is
presented in a manner that complies with the already existing stereotypes in the Indian media
(Ganti, 2004). The character of Modi practices Hinduism and prays to Bhagwan (a Hindu god),
and he believes that his religion, Hinduism, is an ideology and a way of life.
Nationalism
Another common characteristic between the characters of Sehmat and Modi is their love
for the nation. Despite religion being extremely important to them, their priority is always their
country. Through presenting this idea, the two films, PM Narenda Modi and Raazi, are depicting
the importance of national identity.
Religious Identity and Nationalism
The films mainly present intertwined relationship between nationalism and religion. The
notion of intertwined relationship between nationalism and religion resonates with the idea of
Kinnvall (2004), who states that this link between nationalism and religion makes them,
combined, the most powerful identity signifier. Religious association and nationalism interlink
for the character of Modi in the film PM Narendra Modi to an extent that he attempts to present
Hinduism as an ideology that should be held by every Indian. This corresponds with the belief
that religious nationalism can be understood as an instance of the autonomy of culture, source of
identity, epitome of society, and a way to defend national identity (Bonnell & Hunt, 1999;
Friedland, 2001).
On the other hand, Gully Boy portrays nationalism through a different lens. Gully Boy
takes a seemingly anti-nationalistic approach, as it condemns extremism and violence in the
name of love for the country. Extreme nationalism is articulated as a toxic trait in the film, and
the people who advocate for war are derided. This is a rather uncommon and unusual take by a
Bollywood film, especially when compared to other films that are analyzed in this study, for
example Raazi’s depiction of nationalism in a positive light, and the overtly pro-nationalistic
take by PM Narendra Modi.
Despite separately analyzing the themes of nationalism and religious identities in the
films, I have come to the conclusion that these identities are articulated in a highly intertwined
manner. National identity is depicted as the most significant identity by the films Raazi and PM
Narendra Modi. The characters turn to God to pray for the nation, and they set aside their
religious differences when the motherland needs them. Religion is an integral part of the lives of
these characters; however, it is not as important as their country. When it comes solely to
nationalism, two out of the three films look at it through a positive lens and go as far as justifying
war and hostile foreign policy of a country through it. However, the third film, which mainly
focuses on the youth of India, criticizes spending resources on war. When it comes to religious
identity specifically, all three films present it as an important aspect of an individual’s life.
Religious association is depicted as an empowering identity that every individual must seek.
Other Key Findings
Nationalism not only surpasses religion, but for the family of Sehmat, in Raazi, it also
becomes more important than the gender roles set in the South-Asian society. Patriarchy is a
reoccurring theme in all three films. In film Raazi, the opinion of Sehmat’s mother is ignored by
her father, the head of the family, reinforcing the gender roles in the society. However, gender
roles are set aside for the safety of the nation. Sehmat’s father asks her to become a spy and leave
her education, and she abides by her father’s request due to the obligation towards her country.
From this point onwards, the film focuses on the bravery of Sehmat, which supersedes the
gender roles that exists in the Indian society. Hence, religion and patriarchy are important for the
characters of these films, but nothing is as important as their nation.
PM Narendra Modi and Gully Boy attempt to challenge the existing patriarchy through
their storylines. However, in doing so, they also depict the notion of male savior. Women,
despite being strong and capable, need men to fight for them, empower them, and provide them
with a voice. The characters of Modi and Murad are depicted as the “good” men who want to
empower women, and who fight for their rights. However, at various instances during the film,
these characters are portrayed to be speaking for women when the women could have been
speaking for themselves. This also links to the notion of hegemonic masculinity, which is the
representation of society’s ideal regarding the way men should behave (Kareithi, 2014). Kareithi
(2014) believes that the function of hegemonic masculinity is to legitimate the social dominance
of men over women. Additionally, hegemonic masculinity emphasizes the “superiority of
‘manly’ men over the ‘not-so-manly’ men” (p. 26). This social dominance can be represented
through religious practices and mass media. On the whole, the film Gully Boy makes no evident
connection between the gender roles in society and nationalism. PM Narendra Modi focuses on
the empowerment of women for the sake of the prosperity of the country.
When it come Othering, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, and Indian Muslims are depicted as
Others in the three analyzed films. In Raazi and PM Narendra Modi, Indians are viewed as
Others by Pakistanis and vice versa. The film PM Narendra Modi compares the global
performances of India and Pakistan on various occasions and continues to remind the viewers
that, when it comes to accomplishment on the battlefield and sportsground, India is far better
than its neighbor, Pakistan. The film PM Narendra Modi is using cricket to depict Pakistan as the
Other, and it is promoting nationalism among the Indians by using pride for the country as an
instrument.
Similarly, in Raazi, the protagonist is viewed as Other by a Pakistani character due to her
association with India. This segregation based on national identity leads to the creation of
Othering, and it is in turn being used as a tool to promote nationalism by the film, as the notion
of Other is a vital component of the nationalist doctrine. As Ednor (2002) states, popular culture
is often used to blend cultural and traditional rituals with other cultural elements that signifies the
nation in numerous contested ways. These contested ways often lead towards the creation of
Others.
Not only the people belonging from the two neighboring countries, India and Pakistan,
are portrayed as Others by characters in the films. The film Gully Boy sheds light on how the
Muslim community of India can be viewed as Other by the rest of the nation.
When viewed through the lens of social identity theory (Tajfel, 1970, 1982), Muslims in
the film are viewed as the members of outgroups by the Hindus who see themselves as the
member of ingroup. The film mentions the social and political situation in the country, and
subtly criticizes discrimination based on religion. Regardless, this portrayal of Muslims as Others
can be termed as a modern version Orientalism (Said, 1978). The film presents Muslim
characters with various traits ranging from conservatives to supporters of superstitious beliefs,
and from violent individuals to women oppressors. This is in compliance to Ganti’s (2004) belief
that Hindi cinema endorses nationalist projects that mark the Muslim man as a violent other. This
also indicates the existence of the notion of re-Orientalism in the film, which is the compliance
with the West’s construct of Orient (Lau, 2009; Lau & Mendes, 2012; Soğuk, 1993;
Zeydanlıoğlu, 2008). Similarly, the people belonging to the same original nation,
Bangladeshis—or as the film referred to, the people of East-Pakistan—are viewed as Others by
the people of West Pakistan or current Pakistan in film Raazi. The film presents this Othering as
unwarranted and generally condones it through the dialogue delivery.
Another existing theme in films PM Narendra Modi and Gully Boy is class hegemony.
The films depict the presence of class hegemony in India as an adverse trait that needs to be
addressed. The people who challenge the system are depicted as courageous visionaries who
should be leading the nation and providing hope to the people. Whereas Modi’s character is
depicted as a brave individual fighting class hegemony to attain power to serve the country,
Murad’s character ends up detesting nationalism due to the injustices of the society. The
portrayal of class hegemony is another less-explored area in research.
Utilizing the framework of Burke’s Pentad analysis provided a better understanding of
the messages embedded in the films. The symbols, settings, and backgrounds of relevant scenes
were studied collectively to recognize the intended message; This provided a deeper
understanding of how placement of scene, actions, and actors represent the situations of society,
social values, and historical events. The film Raazi presented nationalism and self-sacrifice in a
glorified manner through a major part of its plot. The story of Raazi revolves around Sehmat, the
main agent in the film, who is presented to perform the action of deliberately putting her life in
danger to provide important information to her country’s security agency. The agent’s action
corresponds with the setting that had already established a need for the nation to be saved, as it is
being planned to be attacked by the enemy. Sehmat’s action is portrayed to be performed due to
embedded values, ideas, instincts, and desire, which includes her existing love for the nation,
desire to the nation flourish, believe that nation comes before everything else, and her family’s
previous sacrifices for the country,
The film PM Narendra Modi contains overtly nationalistic messages. The film’s
protagonist Modi is portrayed as an agent whose actions are a result of his unconditional love
and respect for his country. Although PM Narendra Modi contains multiple scenes that contain
the messages of nationalism and self-sacrifice, an example of the representation of this rhetoric is
when Modi decides to go on with his public address despite the threats. Here, the scene is set
with the background information that the country requires Modi’s leadership skills, and the idea
that if he does not go further with his address, the result of the elections will be negatively
affected. Modi, the agent, performs the action of going forward with his address which is
motivated by the embedded values that are taught by his mother, his love for his country, and his
desire to change the destiny of his nation.
Overall, Gully Boy questions the adequacy of nationalism. The film contains multiple
agents who represent the youth of India, and they present the idea of extreme nationalism as a
toxic trait through the lyrics of their rap songs. The main example of this is the song called
Jingoism. In the film, the song Jingoism is performed by underprivileged youth. The setting of
the song establishes that these agents have bigger concerns than politics and international
relations of their country. The agents’ agenda is to voice their concerns and shed a light on more
important issues and existing injustices in the Indian society, and their motivation is fueled by
their personal experiences, the values that they learn on their own as a direct result of their
experiences, and their desire to change the society.
Implications
Disturbances in India due to agitation between members of different religious groups are
not new; however, the recent years have witnessed a surge in such incidents. This study
correlates to the current situation in India, where 53 people have died as a result of recent riots
between Hindu and Muslim population in Delhi (Yasir & Perrigo, 2020). The stimulating
sentiments in the name of nationalism, and Othering people based on their national origins,
tribes, religions, languages, and races are not only limited to South Asia. It is important to
evaluate the created content being created in other regions of the world and understand its impact
on power distribution and governmental policymaking.
An interesting finding of this study is the use of songs by Bollywood films to further
highlight the themes that are established through dialogues. The main idea of Raazi concerns
nationalism. The film contains four songs; two out of these four songs are about nationalism, and
the third song discusses general determinism. The main themes of PM Narendra Modi are love
for one’s country and association with one’s religion. There are six songs in the film; three out
these six songs are about nationalism, two songs are about finding God and religious association,
and the remaining song praises the personality of the protagonist Modi. Gully Boy contains 16
songs. The film challenges class hegemony through its plot. Eight songs of the film address
class hegemony, three songs are about self-determinism, and one song is about jingoism. A study
mostly focusing on the songs of Bollywood films can potentially find interesting results, since
songs are central part of Bollywood films and Bollywood songs are famous among its consumers
around the globe.
Studying films that challenges the notion of extreme nationalism can open new directions
for not only researchers but filmmakers. Media plays a major role in allowing consumers to
relate themselves to others (Anderson, 1991). Films created on subjects will well-researched
impacts can play a significant role in creation of content that can possibly lead to a more
harmonious relationship between members of different religious groups and nations.
Specifically, in today’s environment where film streaming applications are only a click away,
and tolerance seems to be lacking in the society, filmmakers should research the impact of
different messages their films create, and they should create films with the potential of positive
contribution towards the society. Considering the reach of films and the current political and
social environment, it can be concluded that well-researched films can make an impact on the
audiences.
Language is a limitation of this study. The films are originally in Hindi language, with
only excerpts translated into English for the purpose of analysis. When translated in a different
language, dialogues often lose their original meaning, and hence it becomes difficult to study the
use of certain words, phrases, and sentence structures and to analyze their meanings and motives.
Furthermore, this study only focuses on three Bollywood films, a larger sample should be studies
in order to attain better understanding of the presence of the studied themes.
Conclusion
This study explored the portrayal of nationalism and religious identity in Bollywood
films. The findings of this study indicate presence of nationalism in all analyzed film. Out of the
three analyzed films, one film depicts nationalism as noble, while subtly questioning the cost of
sacrifice for the country. The second film views nationalism through an overtly positive lens, and
the third film present blatant and extreme nationalism as a toxic trait. Religion, despite being
depicted as an important factor, is presented as an aid to nationalism. Similar to religion, other
existing themes, such as patriarchy, the notion of Othering, and class hegemony, spiral around
the concept of nationalism. This study contributes towards the better understanding of subjects of
Bollywood films, representation of nationalistic and religious identities, and, in succession, their
impact on the current political situation that goes farther than merely South Asia.
REFERENCES
Ahmad, M. (2019, March 28). Nobody wins when Bollywood and Lollywood go to war.
TheOutline.com. Retrieved from https://theoutline.com/post/7251/bollywood-ban-
pakistan-lollywood-india?zd=1&zi=u54nhh4x.
Ahmed, S., & Matthes, J. (2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to
2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette, 79(3), 219-244.
Aithal, V.(2019, February 2019). Jingostan: Rise of the lazy nationalist. Medium.com. Retrieved
from
https://medium.com/@nuwandavek/jingostan-rise-of-the-lazy-nationalist-b029dca2c930
Ali, S., & Ripley, S. D. (1983). Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan (compact
edition). Oxford University Press and BNHS, Mumbai.
Anand Math. (n.d.). IMDB.com. Retrieved from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0215515/.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of
nationalism. New York, NY: Verso.
Appadurai, A. (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1).
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bjp. (2018, December 27). Riveting tale of how a family held the country to ransom for 10 long
years. Twitter.com. Retrieved from
https://twitter.com/BJP4India/status/1078319849082839041?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^
tweetembed|twterm^1078346280928247809&ref_url=https://www.indiatoday.in/india/st
ory/accidental-prime-minister-manmohan-singh-congress-bjp-spar-1418748-2018-12-28.
Bonnell, A., & Hunt, L. (1999). Beyond the cultural turn. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
Cavendish, M. (2007). World and its peoples: The Arabian Peninsula. New York, NY: Marshal
Cavendish Corporation.
Chotiner, I. (2019, May 24). An Indian political theorist on the triumph of Narendra Modi's Hindu
nationalism. NewYorker.com. Retrieved from https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-
a/an-indian-political-theorist-on-the-triumph-of-narendra-modis-hindu-nationalism.
Dasgupta, R. K. (2015). The visual representation of queer Bollywood: Mistaken identities and
misreadings in Dostana. JAWS: Journal of Arts Writing by Students, 1(1), 91-101.
Desai, J. (2005). Planet Bollywood: Indian cinema in Asian America: Asian American popular
culture. In S. Davé, L. Nishime, & T. G. Oren (Eds.), East Main Street: Asian American
popular culture, (pp. 55-71). New York, NY: New York University Press.
Dhillon, A. (2019, April 29). ‘A narrative is being built’: Bollywood’s battle for Indian hearts
and minds. Theguardian.com. Retrieved from:
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/apr/29/a-narrative-is-being-built-bollywoods-
battle-for-indian-hearts-and-minds
Doniger, W. (2019, October 31). Hinduism and its complicated history with cows (and people
who eat them). Theconversation.com. Retrieved from
http://theconversation.com/hinduism-and-its-complicated-history-with-cows-and-people-
who-eat-them-80586.
Dudrah, R. (2012). Bollywood travels: Culture, diaspora and border crossings in popular Hindi
cinema. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Dudrah, R. K. (2006). Bollywood: Sociology goes to the movies. New Delhi, India: SAGE.
Edensor, T. (2002). National identity, popular culture and everyday life. Oxford, UK:
Bloomsburg Publishing.
Edward, S. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Random House.
Elections 2014 Results: Narendra Modi wins Vadodara Lok Sabha seat by over 5.70 lakh votes.
(2014, May 16). IndiaTimes.com. Retrieved from
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/elections-2014-results-
narendra-modi-wins-vadodara-lok-sabha-seat-by-over-5-70-lakh-
votes/articleshow/35210970.cms.
Electoral Commission halts Narendra Modi biopic. (2019, April 12). Cnn.com. Retrieved from
https://www.cnn.com/india/live-news/india-election-2019-latest-updates-
intl/h_a82ad1d08e6508875b9933a3bce2586c.
Friedland, L. A. (2001). Communication, community, and democracy: Toward a theory of the
Communicatively Integrated Community. Communication Research, 28(4), 358-391.
Friedland, R. (2001). Religious nationalism and the problem of collective representation. Annual
Review of Sociology, 27(1), 125-152.
Ganguly, S. (1995). Wars without end: the Indo-Pakistani conflict. The Annals of the American
Academy of Political and Social Science, 541(1), 167-178.
Ganti, T. (2004). Bollywood: A guidebook to popular Hindi cinema. New York, NY, and
London, UK: Routledge.
Gokulsing, K. M., & Dissanayake, W. (2012). From Aan to Lagaan and Beyond: A Guide to the
study of Indian cinema. Staffordshire, UK: Trentham Books.
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2019). Religious Nationalism and Religious Influence. Oxford Research
Encyclopedia of Politics. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hansen, B. S., & Parpola, A. (Eds.). (1986). South Asian religion and society. Curzon Press.
Hartmann, P. G., & Husband, C. (1974). Racism and the mass media: A study of the role of the
mass media in the formation of white beliefs and attitudes in Britain. London, UK: Davis-
Poynter.
Hoppenstand, G. (1992). Yellow devil doctors and opium dens: The Yellow Peril stereotype in
mass media entertainment. In Nachbar, J., & Lause, K. eds. Popular Culture: An
introductory text, 277-291.
How worried should we be about India's population explosion? (n.d.). Indiatimes.com. Retrieved
from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/how-worried-should-we-be-about-indias-
population-explosion/articleshow/70711314.cms.
Hult, V., & King, K. A. (2011). Terrorism, nationalism and westernization: Code switching and
identity in Bollywood (Eds.). Educational linguistics in practice: Applying the local
globally and the global locally, 1, 27-40.
Hussein, N., & Hussein, S. (2015). Interrogating practices of gender, religion and nationalism in
the representation of Muslim women in Bollywood: contexts of change, sites of
continuity. Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(2), 284-304.
India 'cow vigilantes' lynch three men. (2019, July 19). Bbc.com. Retrieved from
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-49049372.
India job data spells trouble for Narendra Modi. (2019, January 31). Bbc.com. Retrieved from
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-47068223.
India-China War of 1962: How it started and what happened later. (2018, November 21).
Indiatoday.com. Retrieved from https://www.indiatoday.in/education-today/gk-current-
affairs/story/india-china-war-of-1962-839077-2016-11-21.
Indian war and patriotic movies. (2017, June 24). Imdb.com. Retrieved from
https://www.imdb.com/list/ls074940032/.
Islam, M. (2007). Imagining Indian Muslims: Looking through the Lens of Bollywood
Cinema. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(2), 403-422.
Is Bollywood complicit in pushing Modi’s right-wing agenda. (2020, February 14).
Aljazeera.com. Retrieved from
https://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/upfront/2020/02/bollywood-complicit-pushing-
modi-wing-agenda-200214063438607.html
Jamkhandikar, S. (2019, April 10). Bollywood plays starring role in Modi's re-election bid.
Reuters.com. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/india-election-modi-
bollywood/bollywood-plays-starring-role-in-modis-re-election-bid-idUSKCN1RM0K5.
Kareithi, P. J. (2014). Hegemonic masculinity in media. Media and gender: a scholarly agenda
for the Global Alliance on Media and Gender, 30. Paris, France: UNESCO.
Kaur, R. (2002). Viewing the eest through Bollywood: A celluloid Occident in the
making. Contemporary South Asia, 11(2), 199-209.
Kaur, R., & Sinha, A. J. (Eds.). (2005). Bollyworld: Popular Indian cinema through a
transnational lens. New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications India.
Khan, S. (2009). Nationalism and Hindi cinema: Narrative strategies in Fanaa. Studies in South
Asian Film & Media, 1(1), 85-99.
Khatun, N. (2016). Imagining Muslims as the ‘Other’ in Muslim political films. Journal of Arab
& Muslim Media Research, 9(1), 41-60.
Khatun, N. (2018). Love-Jihad’ and Bollywood: Constructing Muslims as ‘Other. Journal of
Religion & Film, 22(3), 8.
Kinnvall, C. (2004). Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for
ontological security. Political Psychology, 25(5), 741-767.
Kumar H. M., S. (2013). Constructing the nations enemy: Hindutva, popular culture and the
Muslim “other” in Bollywood cinema. Third World Quarterly, 34(3), 458–469.
Lau, L. (2009). Re-Orientalism: The perpetration and development of Orientalism by Orientals.
Modern Asian Studies, 43(2), 571-90.
Manmohan Singh: India's 'accidental PM' biopic causes stir. (2019, January 18). Bbc.com.
Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-46861434.
Masci, D. (2017, January 31). World Muslim population more widespread than you might think.
Pewresearch.com. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-
tank/2017/01/31/worlds-muslim-population-more-widespread-than-you-might-think/
Matusitz, J., & Payano, P. (2011). The Bollywood in Indian and American perceptions:
comparative analysis. India Quarterly, 67(1), 65-77.
Merelli, A. (2019, December 30). The state of global right-wing populism in 2019. Quartz.com.
Retrieved from
https://qz.com/1774201/the-global-state-of-right-wing-populism-in-2019/
Modi biopic should not be released till the end of general elections, says Election Commission.
(2019, April 10). Thehindubusinessline.com. Retrieved from
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/ec-bans-modi-biopic-during-
election-period/article26791776.ece.
Mohammad, R. (2007). Phir bhi dil hai Hindustani (Yet the heart remains Indian): Bollywood,
the ‘homeland’ nation-state, and the diaspora. Environment and Planning Society and
Space, 25(6), 1015-1040.
Mudambi, A. (2013). Another look at orientalism:(An) othering in Slumdog Millionaire. Howard
Journal of Communications, 24(3), 275-292.
Nayak, M. (2006). Orientalism and ‘saving’ US state identity after 9/11. International Feminist
Journal of Politics, 8(1), 42-61.
Nielsen, K. (1998). Liberal nationalism, Liberal democracies and secession. University of
Toronto Law Journal, 48(2): 253–295.
No PM Narendra Modi biopic release before May 19: Election Commission tells Supreme Court.
(2019, April 24). Indiatoday.com. Retrieved from
https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/bollywood/story/no-pm-narendra-modi-biopic-release-
before-may-19-election-commission-tells-supreme-court-1508847-2019-04-24.
Ogden, C. (2012). A lasting legacy: The BJP-led national democratic alliance and India's.
Politics Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(1), 22-33.
Osuri, G., & Banerjee, B. (2004). White diasporas: Media representations of September 11 and
the unbearable whiteness of being in Australia. Social Semiotics, 14(2), 151-171.
Pavan Kumar, M. (2012). Introduction: Orientalism (s) after 9/11. Journal of Postcolonial
Writing, 48(3), 233-240.
Pramucitra, S. (2018). Honesty value on film pentad analysis on short movie Djitoeng. Advances
in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 206.
Rajadhyaksha, A. (2003). The 'Bollywoodization' of the Indian cinema: cultural nationalism in a
global arena. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 4(1), 25-39.
Rasul, A., & Proffitt, J. M. (2011). Bollywood and the Indian Premier League (IPL): the political
economy of Bollywood's new blockbuster. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(4), 373
388.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Self and nation. London, UK: Sage.
Roy, A. G. (Ed.). (2012). The magic of Bollywood: At home and abroad. SAGE Publications
India.
Sarbjit. (n.d.). Legendglobalstudio.com. Retrieved from:
http://legendglobalstudio.com/sarabjit.php
Said, E. (1984). Orientalism reconsidered: Postcolonial criticism. Abingdon: UK: Routledge.
Schein, L. (1997). Gender and internal orientalism in China. Modern China, 23(1), 69-98.
Shaheen Jack. 2009. Reel Bad Arabs: How Hollywood Vilifies a People. Northampton, MA:
Olive Branch Press.
Soanes, C. (2006). Compact Oxford English Dictionary for University and College Students,
548. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
South Asia: Gujarat riot death toll revealed. (2005, May 11). Bbc.com. Retrieved from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4536199.stm.
Srivastava, N. (2009). Bollywood as National(ist) Cinema: Violence, Patriotism and the
National-Popular in Rang De Basanti. Third Text, 23(6), 703-716.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology
Quarterly, 63, 224-237.
Tajfel, H. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific American, 223(5), 96-103.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of
Psychology, 33(1), 1-39.
Takhar, A., Maclaran, P., & Stevens, L. (2012). Bollywood cinema’s global reach: consuming
the “Diasporic Consciousness”. Journal of Macromarketing, 32(3), 266-279.
Thakur, C. (2019, May 28). How PM Narendra Modi biopic helped Vivek Oberoi bag his first hit
since his Bollywood debut. Indiatoday.com. Retrieved from
https://www.indiatoday.in/movies/bollywood/story/how-pm-narendra-modi-biopic-
helped-vivek oberoi-bag-his-first-hit-since-his-bollywood-debut-1536875-2019-05-28.
The triumph of Modi propaganda in Bollywood. (2019, February 5). Scmp.com. Retrieved from
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/society/article/2184614/triumph-modi-propaganda-
bollywood.
Totti, X. (1987). The making of a Latino ethnic identity. Dissent, 34(4), 537-542.
Triandafyllidou, A. (1998). National identity and the 'other'. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(4),
593-612.
Tyrrell, H. (2004). Bollywood versus Hollywood. The globalization reader, 312-318.
Uri: The Surgical Strike. (n.d.). Imdb.com. Retrieved from
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8291224/plotsummary.
Van der Veer, P. (2000). Religious nationalism in India and global fundamentalism.
Globalization of Social Movements, 315-339.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1999). Discourse and racism. Discourse and Society,10, 148- 159.
Xypolia, I. (2017). British Imperialism and Turkish Nationalism in Cyprus, 1923-1939: Divide,
Define and Rule. Routledge.
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2018). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application
(4
th
ed.). New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Yasir, S., & Perrigo, B. (2020, March 3). Delhi riots: What's next for India's Muslims? Retrieved
from https://time.com/5794354/delhi-riots-muslims-india/
Zeydanlıoğlu, W. (2008). The white Turkish man’s burden: Orientalism, Kemalism and the
Kurds in Turkey. Neo-colonial Mentalities in Contemporary Europe, 4(2), 155-174.